-
-
September 30, 2024 at 10:55 am
kjh0703
SubscriberHi,
Â
I'm obtaining a motor's dq inductance matrix.
Well, overall matrix trend seems good. But I need a fine data.
Is there any way to reduce numerical noise? For example, changing solver.
I tried to set smaller mesh at airgap surface between stator and rotor as in the piture below but it didn't improve significantly.
-
October 1, 2024 at 2:24 pm
NA
Ansys EmployeeDear @kjh0703,
There are a couple of things that could influence the error on the magnetic field especially in the airgap and hence the inductances of the windings. First comment would be to refine the mesh inside the airgap and not just on surfaces. The second hint would be to always include an inner band and outer band when simulating a motion setup. Third point, but very important for low noise results is to match the motion speed with the band mesh segments and timestep. Basically, you achieve minimum noise when for each timestep you have a rotation of an integer number of segments of shift in the band.
I hope this helps!
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Three-Phase Voltage Imbalances in dual stator electric generator
- Co-simulation in Q3D, Icepak – meshing problem
- Classic Icepak – clarifications on Boundary condition
- Link the Circuit to 3D Terminals
- Magnetic Dipole moment calculation
- Integration lines or U Axis Line for circular and rectangular ports
- Core Loss in ANSYS MAXWELL Eddy Current solution
- exporting and importing my Netlist for my external circuit
- Error of Metal Fraction in Icepak Classic.
- The unit of theta in Is*sin(2*pi*fre*Time+theta-2*pi/3)
-
4597
-
1495
-
1386
-
1209
-
1021
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.


