-
-
August 28, 2019 at 6:05 pmsolovievSubscriber
Hello,
We are currently working on running an MHD model which incorporates the ocean, atmosphere, and seafloor. We found that when running models with the atmosphere, the magnetic signal between the air and sea does not make sense. We are guessing it may be due to the following (found in the Fluent Theory Guide):
Â
For multiphase flows, assuming that the electric surface current at the interface between phases can be ignored, the electric conductivity for the mixture is given by:
(2–28)
where  and  are respectively the electric conductivity and volume fraction of phase .  is used in solving the induction equations.
Is there a way to incorporate a UDF to implement these ignored terms?
Thanks,
Alex
-
October 2, 2019 at 8:31 pmsolovievSubscriber
Hello,
Â
Is there any update to this issue?
Â
Thanks,
Alex -
October 8, 2019 at 3:25 pmRobForum Moderator
I think you can do this using a UDF to location the free surface and then do "something" to the electric field, the "how" will be somewhat more difficult, and is beyond what I can do here.Â
-
October 8, 2019 at 4:01 pmsolovievSubscriber
We do have a UDF which we implemented, but we didn't see much of a change in the results. Do you know why that might be?
Â
Thanks,
Alex
-
October 11, 2019 at 12:02 pmRobForum Moderator
Could be it's a function of the shared velocity field in VOF? If you post process the field does the code put enough "stuff" in the right place?
-
October 14, 2019 at 8:29 pmsolovievSubscriber
 I actually did not write this, but another member of our team did who has since left.  The UDF was written for each component (U, W) of the velocity. Is this what you meant by it being a function of the shared velocity field? Because the way It is written it appears as though its not a function of the shared but rather of the components individually.Â
Â
Thanks,Â
Alex
-
October 16, 2019 at 3:33 pmRobForum Moderator
No, I was wondering how it interacted with the two phases at the boundary. Unfortunately it's going to be beyond what we can cover on here.Â
-
October 18, 2019 at 3:42 pmsolovievSubscriber
Thank you. I will look into the interaction at the two phases at the boundary.Â
Â
Thanks,
Alex
-
- The topic ‘Adding Source Terms in Multiphase Flow MHD model’ is closed to new replies.
- How do I get my hands on Ansys Rocky DEM
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Facing trouble regarding setting up boundary conditions for SOEC Modeling
- Script Error
- convergence issue for transonic flow
-
1727
-
624
-
599
-
591
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.