Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Absorbed Visible Solar Flux — Unexpected Results?

    • patrickm7995
      Subscriber

      I have a thin plate with the bottom surface receiving solar flux, and the other surfaces being fully transparent and the inside of the geometry being air with very low (1e-5) density.

      This bottom wall was set to 0 transmissivity and 0 absorptivity for this case, so it was expected that the solar radiation coming in (1377 W/m2) would be split between reflectivity in the IR and visible, 688.5 W/m2, which occured.

      However, the absorbed visible solar flux map was also showing a value, which was unexpected. The absorbed IR was as expected, 0 W/m2. 

      Does anyone have any reasons this may be occuring? Thank you.

    • SVV
      Ansys Employee

      Hi,

      Can you please check your settings again?

      Please note absorbed visible solar flux is not evalueted for opaque surface.

       

      • patrickm7995
        Subscriber

        Thank you for your reply. Sorry, I am confused: opaque surfaces do not have absorbed solar flux?

    • li can
      Subscriber

      i have the same confusing , how  to set opaque surface condition to absorb solar flux ? 

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Absorbed Visible Solar Flux — Unexpected Results?’ is closed to new replies.
[bingo_chatbox]