I used a high frequency because at a lower time step it said that many of them were lost outside the domain. I am using a high tracking step number because I was under the impressure that it just meant fluent would track the particles for longer. The injections near the edge are straight down to simulate the effects of film cooling. Shed is due to having the breakup model on. There is no wall film model. None of this really explains why the particles wouldn't be evaporating though...
You are navigating away from the AIS Discovery experience