AG
Ansys Employee

 It's good to hear that your results are converging and comparable to literature despite the residuals not dropping below 1e-3 for finer meshes. When you refine the mesh, it's possible that the solver requires more iterations to converge due to the increased number of elements and the complexity of the solution. Since your results are converging and are comparable to literature, and your mesh metrics are good, it suggests that your simulation is behaving as expected. Running simulation for longer time will sort out this issue. 

However additionally check for following details : 1. Investigate if there are any regions in the domain where the mesh might be too coarse or too fine, which could affect the residuals. 2. Make sure you are using proper volume mesh growth rate (<1.1) in all cases and accordingly 1st cell height is also changed. 3. Even though you mentioned the mesh metrics are good, it's worth re-evaluating the mesh quality in the refined areas. Ensure that there are no highly skewed elements or small faces that could be affecting the solution.

Remember, achieving a balance between accuracy and computational cost is key. It's not uncommon for finer meshes to require more iterations and computational power to reach similar levels of convergence as coarser meshes.