Reply To: QMOM correction included

[Rob]

Yes, I'd see what Fluent gives with time, and then review.  I'm always wary of models that look at the result and then modify it based on another correlation: if the correlation is that good why not use it as a UDF, and if not, why would I trust it over the initial model? Unless it happens to give exactly the result I want..... then I'd publish it! ;)