Â
Â
Hello,
the Simulation that gave the error message in the original post had exactly the evolution parameters that the expert system suggests in the listing file.
I’ve run two simulations with different parameters since, in both of those I aditionally turned on viscous heating (because I forgot in the previous one), the the evolution parameters are not the only thing I changed:
Â
Â
1. Evol parameters at f(s) = 1/s   //   S-ini = 0.3   //   Delta_S-ini = 0.2   //   Delta_S-max = 0.25
Â
I still get an error message, with the following suggestions:
*****************************
   *  Expert tool diagnostics  *
   *****************************
   The problem F.E.M. Task    has not converged.
   The evolution scheme can not reach the final value of the evolutionÂ
   parameter 1.  Evolution stops for a value of the evolution parameterÂ
   equals to 0.9984 because the step size has been reduced below theÂ
   minimum (as assigned in Polydata).
   *****************************
   *  Expert tool suggestions  *
   *****************************
   The grid Brinkman number (Br), which is defined as follows:Â
     Viscous heating/ Thermal diffusion (ONLY IF TEMPERATURE IS NOTÂ
      CONSTANT) ,
   is equal to 7.97e+08 (greather than 20.0). Â
   It could be too large and induce convergence difficulties.  PleaseÂ
   check the setup of the simulation and more specifically :
    – the flow rate or the entry velocity,
    – the viscosity,
    – the thermal conductivity,
    – the coordinates,
    – the coherence of system units.
   There is a non-linearity in the problem Navier-Stokes 3D introducedÂ
   by the viscous heating.
   The expert system suggests to use an evolution for the scaling factorÂ
   related to the viscous heating.  The evolution scheme must be theÂ
   following :
    –  f(s) = s
    –  S-ini = order of 0.001 such as the viscous heating could beÂ
     neglectedÂ
    –  S-final = 1.0Â
    –  Initial increment = S-in
   There is a non-linearity in the problem Navier-Stokes 3D introducedÂ
   by the viscous heating.
   The expert system suggests to use an evolution for the thermalÂ
   conductivity.  The evolution scheme must be the following :
    –  f(s) = 1/s
    –  S-ini = order of 0.001 such as the diffusivity is dominant.
    –  S-final = 1.0Â
    –  Initial increment = S-ini
   If you can not define the evolution with those typical values of theÂ
   evolution parameters, maybe your problem is not well defined.  PleaseÂ
   check the setup of your simulations.
Â
2. Evol parameters of the second simulation f(s) = 1/s   //   S-ini = 0.755   //   Delta_S-ini = 0.09437   //   Delta_S-max = 0.25
*****************************
   *  Expert tool diagnostics  *
   *****************************
   The problem F.E.M. Task    has not converged.
   The evolution scheme can not reach the final value of the evolutionÂ
   parameter 1.  Evolution stops for a value of the evolution parameterÂ
   equals to 0.9993 because the step size has been reduced below theÂ
   minimum (as assigned in Polydata).
   *****************************
   *  Expert tool suggestions  *
   *****************************
   The grid Brinkman number (Br), which is defined as follows:Â
     Viscous heating/ Thermal diffusion (ONLY IF TEMPERATURE IS NOTÂ
      CONSTANT) ,
   is equal to 9.47e+08 (greather than 20.0). Â
   It could be too large and induce convergence difficulties.  PleaseÂ
   check the setup of the simulation and more specifically :
    – the flow rate or the entry velocity,
    – the viscosity,
    – the thermal conductivity,
    – the coordinates,
    – the coherence of system units.
   There is a non-linearity in the problem Navier-Stokes 3D introducedÂ
   by the viscous heating.
   The expert system suggests to use an evolution for the scaling factorÂ
   related to the viscous heating.  The evolution scheme must be theÂ
   following :
    –  f(s) = s
    –  S-ini = order of 0.001 such as the viscous heating could beÂ
     neglectedÂ
    –  S-final = 1.0Â
    –  Initial increment = S-ini
   There is a non-linearity in the problem Navier-Stokes 3D introducedÂ
   by the viscous heating.
   The expert system suggests to use an evolution for the thermalÂ
   conductivity.  The evolution scheme must be the following :
    –  f(s) = 1/s
    –  S-ini = order of 0.001 such as the diffusivity is dominant.
    –  S-final = 1.0Â
    –  Initial increment = S-ini
   There is a non-linearity in problem Navier-Stokes 3D introduced byÂ
   the power law index (n) of the viscosity law.  The value of the powerÂ
   law index is 0.755.
   The expert system suggests to use a Picard iterative scheme with aÂ
   number of iterations about 30 or 40.
   There is a non-linearity in problem Navier-Stokes 3D introduced byÂ
   the power law index (n) of the viscosity law.  The value of the powerÂ
   law index is 0.755.
   The expert system suggests to use an evolution for this parameterÂ
   coupling with Newton-Raphson iterative scheme.  The evolution schemeÂ
   must be the following :Â
    –  f(s) = 1/s
    –  S-ini = n = 0.755
    –  S-final = 1.0Â
    –  Initial increment = 0.9437 = n/0.8.
   If you can not define the evolution with those typical values of theÂ
   evolution parameters, maybe your problem is not well defined.  PleaseÂ
   check the setup of your simulations.
Â
What I don’t understand is the expert system suggesting multiple different evolution parameters, ranging from the f(s) being different and even the values for the different s being different, as it is one FEM Task. Doesn’t this mean that I can only ever have the same parameters?
What should I do next? I don’t know where I can change the Brinkman number, I don’t even know if I can change the visous heating bit…
Â
I hope the answer isn’t too much all over the place. Thank you in adavance for your help!
Â