Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

CFX 2019 R2

    • 1805611570
      Subscriber

      Title: Question regarding Buoyancy Model setup in ANSYS CFX for stratified multiphase flow

      Hello CFD experts,

      Currently, I am using ANSYS CFX to simulate the multiphase flow (slag and molten iron) inside the molten pool of a submerged arc furnace. There are two immiscible fluids in the domain with a significant density difference (slag ~2800 kg/m³, molten iron ~7200 kg/m³). My question is regarding the Buoyancy Model settings.

      1. Physical Assumptions:
      The literature I am referencing states that the "influence of thermal buoyancy on the molten pool flow can be neglected, and the pool is primarily driven by the Lorentz force". However, physically, the molten iron must sink to the bottom and the slag must float on top due to gravity, meaning gravity-driven stratification must exist.

      2. Software Setting Confusion:
      In the CFX Domain settings, if I set the Buoyancy Model option to Non Buoyant, does this mean the CFX solver will completely ignore not only thermal buoyancy, but also gravitational acceleration (i.e., gravity will not be included in the momentum equation)?

      3. Seeking the Correct Configuration:
      If setting it to Non Buoyant directly prevents the flow from achieving density-based stratification, how should I correctly configure the settings in CFX to achieve the physical assumption of "ignoring thermal buoyancy (i.e., ignoring natural convection caused by temperature differences), while retaining gravity to allow the molten iron and slag to stratify"?

      Thank you very much for your guidance and corrections in advance!

    • Vivek Praveen
      Subscriber

      Hi,
      From my understanding, the literature is saying that the flow due to temperature differences can be ignored. That means natural convection caused by heating/cooling is not important in this case.
      But this does not mean that gravity should be ignored. Since molten iron is much heavier than slag, iron should still settle at the bottom and slag should stay on top.
      So, if you set the domain as Non Buoyant in CFX, it may not be the right choice for this problem. With Non Buoyant, CFX will not consider the gravity/buoyancy effect needed for the two fluids to separate based on density.
      So, to get slag and molten iron stratification, buoyancy/gravity should be kept active, but neglect the density variation so that thermal buoyancy is not included.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
[bingo_chatbox]