-
-
July 6, 2020 at 5:29 pm
MTLCY
SubscriberDear Engineers,
Â
I am working on a rock cutting simulation. What I care about are contact force and mass of rock debris. When I using FEM model, the contact force is much less than experimental results due to the failed element deleting. Therefore, I tried FEM-SPH method. The contact force is in good agreement with experimental results when I using FEM-SPH without mat add erosion, but no rock debris produced. However, when I using FEM-SPH with mat add erosion, the contact force is still less than experimental results due to the rock particles fly out.
Here are some details about my model,
Rock: SPH , Mohr-Coulomb model
Disc cutter: FEM, rigid
Contact: *CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_NODES_TO_SURFACE
CONTROL CONTACT: enmass=1
Failure criterion: tension failure, set the value of MNPRES in *MAT_ADD_EROSION to minus tensile strength (got from static Brazilian splitting test).
Â
Could you tell me how to get reasonable contact force when using MAT_ADD_EROSION in FEM-SPH model?
Thank you in advance.
-
August 12, 2020 at 11:41 pm
MTLCY
SubscriberUsing FORM=1n
-
- The topic ‘How to avoid contact force decreasing caused by MAT_ADD_EROSION in LS-DYNA’ is closed to new replies.
- The legend values are not changing.
- LPBF Simulation of dissimilar materials in ANSYS mechanical (Thermal Transient)
- Convergence error in modal analysis
- APDL, memory, solid
- How to model a bimodular material in Mechanical
- Meaning of the error
- Simulate a fan on the end of shaft
- Real Life Example of a non-symmetric eigenvalue problem
- Nonlinear load cases combinations
- How can the results of Pressures and Motions for all elements be obtained?
-
4032
-
1461
-
1308
-
1136
-
1021
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.