-
-
June 26, 2020 at 2:05 am
narendrapatel111
SubscriberI have two infinitely long and wide flow zones- (1) free flow zone and (2) porous flow zone and both zones make an interface so that water can flow from one zone to other zone. Can I assign two periodic boundary conditions: First for Inlet 1 and Outlet 1; second for Inlet 2 and Outlet 2 as shown in figure? Is interface an issue? I have same pressure drop between inlets and outlets for both zones.
Â
-
June 26, 2020 at 2:07 am
-
June 26, 2020 at 12:12 pm
Amine Ben Hadj Ali
Ansys EmployeeIf pressure drop related periodicity you will have a single streamwise direction. Also check if you are hitting any limitations.
-
June 26, 2020 at 12:14 pm
Karthik Remella
AdministratorHello,
I've got a feeling that this might not be allowed. I'll have to test this out and get back to you.Â
Thanks.
Karthik
-
June 26, 2020 at 1:00 pm
narendrapatel111
SubscriberI have pressure drop only in streamwise direction. My concern is I have two inlets and two outlets, hence I have to assign two periodic BCs. Both flow zones make an interface. In spanwise/lateral direction, I have no pressure drop and I can assign wall BC (or symmetry to make domain wider) for sides.
Karthik, please check it. Userguide says no source or sink is allowed between the periodic BC, this is the limitation I found but didn't find details if two periodic BCs with interface can be applied.
Thanks.
-
June 30, 2020 at 5:45 pm
narendrapatel111
SubscriberHi Karthik, Did you test it? Thanks. Narendra
-
July 1, 2020 at 1:12 am
Karthik Remella
AdministratorHello,
My apologies for the delay. Yes, you should be able to do this in Fluent. Please use the following TUI commands to make the periodic boundary conditions.
Here are some screenshots.
TUI command:
/mesh/modify-zones> make-per
Output on Fluent Console:
Periodic zone [()] per-a-bot
Shadow zone [()] per-b-bot
Rotationally periodic? (if no, translationally) [yes] no
Create periodic zones? [yes]Â
Auto detect translation vector? [yes]Â
 computed translation deltas: 0.020000 -0.000000 0.000000Â
 zone 9 deleted
Please let me know if this works for you.
Thanks.
Karthik
Â
Â
-
July 8, 2020 at 5:59 am
narendrapatel111
SubscriberHi, I tried this. I encountered a doubt about flow direction. I assigned flow direction, lets say +X direction (1,0,0) and assigned pressure gradient (+ve value) then I see flow moving in -ve X direction. Does it decide direction based on direction assigned to velocity components in initialization or naming of the faces? I want to make sure that I am not messing up with directions assigned to values I enter in GUI. Thanks.
-
July 8, 2020 at 12:27 pm
narendrapatel111
SubscriberHI Karthik, Could you please check it and tell me. Also, I am getting lower velocity than expected value. Any suggestion would be appreciated.
Thanks.
-
July 8, 2020 at 12:50 pm
Karthik Remella
AdministratorHello,
The flow is based on the pressure gradient you assign. This is what dictates whether you have a +ve or -ve value of velocity along the X direction.Â
Does this answer your question? If it does, please feel free to make the most appropriate answer as 'Is Solution' to benefit the community.
Thanks.
Karthik
-
- The topic ‘Periodic Boundary conditions’ is closed to new replies.
- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
-
3882
-
1414
-
1241
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.