Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Some problems when simulate reaction using EDC model in fluent

TAGGED: 

    • sunyi24
      Subscriber

      I am using the EDC model in Fluent to simulate the co-firing of ammonia and coal. I employed a simplified Okafor mechanism to describe the gas-phase reactions. However, when analyzing the results, I noticed the presence of NH2 radicals in the pipe carrying pure ammonia, and a relatively high concentration of O atoms in the OFA pipe supplying pure air. The reaction mechanism I used does not include the direct decomposition reaction of ammonia (NH3 = NH2 + H). In theory, there should be no NH2 in the ammonia pipe and no O in the OFA pipe. Although the concentrations are not high, this significantly affects the credibility of my results. Is this due to numerical false diffusion or computational error?

    • Essence
      Ansys Employee

      Hello,

      Which reaction mechanism you have used?

    • sunyi24
      Subscriber

      Thanks for your reply!

      I used Okafor mechanism reduced by myself to simulate the gas reaction.This mechanism comprises 102 homogeneous (gas-phase) reactions and 5 gas-solid reactions.  I have compared the reduced mechanism with original Okafor mechanism using Chemkin, in my opinion, it's usable.

      Although determining the cause remains a goal, the presence of NH₂ radicals within the tube is now less concerning. More intriguingly, significant NO formation is observed near the wall upstream of the outlet following ammonia injection, despite the absence of a recirculation zone in the flow field.

    • Essence
      Ansys Employee

      I see. Can you please check if you have any NO and/or the NH2 in the species list in the mechanism? Generally, it is quite difficult to diagnose the issue if you have modified the things like - mechanism itself. Can you try out in the other unmodified mechanism just in case?

    • sunyi24
      Subscriber

      Yes,NO , NH2, NH, N are all in the mixture.Unmodified mechanism usually needs much time to solve out. That's why I need to do some reduction.Is the noticeable NO generation reaction phenomenon upstream of the ammonia pipe outlet caused by the grid, the algorithm, or something else?

    • Essence
      Ansys Employee

      Please check if the mass/mole fraction of the NO, NH2, NH and N are defined as zero. If not, then you can expect these species in your domain. Also please re-check if there is really no reaction involving the before mentioned species.

    • sunyi24
      Subscriber

      The mole fractions of these species at the inlet boundary are all set to 0. The phenomenon of NO generation reaction occurring upstream of the ammonia pipe outlet varies with the ammonia injection location. Specifically, when ammonia is injected at 0.6 m, the reaction appears between 0.4–0.6 m; when injected at 0.4 m, the reaction occurs between 0.2–0.4 m. It seems as though the ammonia from the pipe outlet is shifting upstream, but no backflow is observed. I'm wondering if this could be a numerical issue, perhaps related to the grid? The minimum orthogonal quality of my grid is 0.52, with a stretch ratio of 18.It seems that the grid is not so bad.

    • Essence
      Ansys Employee

      As you mentioned, please ensure that there is no reaction for NO to be generated. Also, please re-check if there is no flow reversal of ammonia. I am a bit suspicious about it. If possible, remove the reaction of formation of NO from the mechanism.

Viewing 7 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.