TAGGED: -adaptive-mesh
-
-
October 28, 2025 at 12:54 pm
j.j.a.v.zutphen
SubscriberI am working with an adaptive mesh for a 2phase flow.
The left of the domain is made finer than the right, and I want the left and right to have the same relative adaption.
I get the desired result when doing a "Adapt-->Manual" as the following image:
But when I use the same setting for automatic adaption, the right side has more relative refinement.
The mesh goes from 500k cells to 1.2M in both cases.
These are the settings:
Why is the manual and automatic not the same, and how do I have more control over this?
Kind regards,
Jasper -
October 29, 2025 at 4:02 pm
jcooper
Ansys EmployeeHi Jasper:
You didn't mention what your refinement criteria are, at what point the manual adaption was done vs. the automatic adaption, or what the green isosurface is, so the question is difficult to answer. To me, the automatic adaption actually looks better, because you at least get some refinement of the VOF stream on the right. Comparing the two images, it almost looks like the manual adaption overrefined on the left side and then just ran out of nodes when it got to the right, leaving you with little refinement there.
If you are using predefined adaption criteria, it is possible that these are not interacting well with your mesh. To set your own adaption criteria, run a solution without refinement and then use this to calculate values for your criteria, ie: typical volume fraction gradient values:
This way of creating adaption criteria allows you to select an appropriate gradient (or other variable) value to trigger adaption and preview cells where the adaption will occur. For instance, you can set your adaption for the top X% of the gradient or variable range that is calculated. I would also specify a minimum cell size in the adaption controls based on what you need to resolve to keep the mesh from getting overly refined in one area and consuming all the nodes.
Once you are happy with the setting, copy to automatic adaption to set the frequency:
Â
If you are using a recent release, I would also recommend using PUMA adaption over the legacy hanging node methods.
Regards,
Judy
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
-
4167
-
1487
-
1358
-
1189
-
1021
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.



