-
-
May 27, 2020 at 11:52 pm
asade010
SubscriberHello,
I am trying to use EREINF command to embed my reinforcement in my solid concrete elements. I am currently not modeling any non-linearity.
When viewing results from a simple analysis there are erroneous graphs that make me doubt that the EREINF command is working properly. The reinforcements that are aligned in Z direction are showing bulging with large deformations which is very strange. I have 8 sets of reinforcement defined. 3 of them are in Z direction, all have similar erroneous results. The rest of them look fine.
All my solid elements are quad and I did not change any of them. The loading is displacement control in Y direction upwards.
I would be grateful if someone could take a look at my code and help me. I use version 2019 R1 Academic.
Thanks,
Attached are deformations from two sets of reinforcement (deckl and deckt) in my model.
This is the APDL code I used:
FINI
/PREP7
*SET,MAT_ID,2002Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â !STEEL REBAR MATERIAL
DENS_=7850.0
EX_=2.1E+5
NUXY_=0.3
MP,DENS,MAT_ID,DENS_,
MP,EX,MAT_ID,EX_,
MP,NUXY,MAT_ID,NUXY_,
AREA_3=71Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ! #3
AREA_4=129Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ! #4
AREA_5=200Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ! #5
*SET,NEWSEC3,3003
SECTYPE,NEWSEC3,REINF,DISCRETE,n3
SECDATA,MAT_ID,AREA_3,MESH
*SET,NEWSEC4,3004
SECTYPE,NEWSEC4,REINF,DISCRETE,n4
SECDATA,MAT_ID,AREA_4,MESH
*SET,NEWSEC5,3005
SECTYPE,NEWSEC5,REINF,DISCRETE,n3
SECDATA,MAT_ID,AREA_5,MESH
*SET,NEWTYPE,1002
ET,NEWTYPE,200,2
CMSEL,S,NS_DECKL,ELEM               !!   DECKL
EMODIF,ALL,TYPE,NEWTYPE
EMODIF,ALL,SECNUM,NEWSEC4
CMSEL,A,NS_CONC,ELEM
EREINF
ESEL,S,ENAME,,264Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â !!
CM,CM_DECKL,ELEM
CMSEL,S,NS_DECKT,ELEM               !!   DECKT
EMODIF,ALL,TYPE,NEWTYPE
EMODIF,ALL,SECNUM,NEWSEC4
CMSEL,A,NS_CONC,ELEM
EREINF
ESEL,S,ENAME,,264Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â !!
CMSEL,U,CM_DECKL,ELEM
CM,CM_DECKT,ELEM
!!Here is the rest of the definition of reinforcement similar to the two above I removed for this post.
!....
ESEL,S,ENAME,,200
EDEL,ALL
ALLSEL,ALL
FINI
/SOLU -
May 27, 2020 at 11:55 pm
-
June 1, 2020 at 5:34 pm
asade010
SubscriberI really appreciate it if anyone has any idea about what goes wrong here.
I have tried many scenarios, like changing geometry and defining the reinforcement all in one step, but I get similar outcomes.
-
June 18, 2020 at 8:31 pm
Sheldon Imaoka
Ansys EmployeeHi asade010,
For the model you have, you mentioned 'all my solid elements are quad', but are you dealing with shell elements (quad) or hexahedral solid elements (hex)?
For the reinforcements, after generating them with EREINF, were you able to visually confirm them by selecting only the REINF264 elements and plotting with /ESHAPE,1? Did the definition of the elemetns look OK?
I apologize, as it's not clear from the images what is going on, but is it possible that the reinforcements along z-direction are not connected/defined properly? It seems like the reinforcement elements are rotating (they only have uniaxial stiffness) based on the plots, but is it possible that the underlying elements are also behaving in a strange manner?
Regards,
Sheldon
Â
-
June 19, 2020 at 2:24 am
asade010
SubscriberHi Sheldon,
All my solid elements are hexahedral (185) in this model.
The element definition looks fine as you can see in the above figures these are plots of two sets of defined reinforcement. I just set them based on their type after the ERINF command and then in the solution commands, I plot the sets only not to get too confusing. If I plot as you say (all the 264 elements) simply would be the superposition of the two figures.
My element definition is simply the same for all my sets (see the command lines above). I even tried defining all rebars at the same time but the results would be similar.
I recently opened another discussion and uploaded a small model (a cube with 3 rebars in 3 directions) and got the same strange behavior. You can see that and better understand my issue.
/forum/forums/topic/reinf264-shows-wrong-results/
Looking forward to your reply,
Thanks,
Amir
-
June 19, 2020 at 10:10 pm
Sheldon Imaoka
Ansys EmployeeHi Amir,
Thanks for letting me know about your other post. I provided a reply - please review.
Thanks,
Sheldon
-
- The topic ‘Issues with EREINF and reinf264’ is closed to new replies.
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Script Error Code:800a000d
- Element has excessive thickness change, distortion, is turning inside out
- Elastic limit load, Elastic-plastic limit load
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
- Help to do quasistatic analysis in static structural module
-
1937
-
839
-
599
-
591
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.