-
-
October 10, 2025 at 10:37 pm
daniel.richardson
SubscriberWhen modeling lumped ports in HFSS, is renormalization equivalent to re-simulation?
For context, I have been modeling antennas. I am curious if when I change the port impedance in the model from say 50 ohms to 1 ohm, if I need to re-simulate with that new port impedance, or if I can just renormalize to 1 ohm to get the correct response. My personal intuition is that you do in fact need to re-simulate because the port is a physical boundary condition in the model, and thus this new impedances changes the field profiles. My intuition is that using renormalization as a substitute for re-simulation can get you close as an approximation if the field profiles are not substantially altered between changes in impedance. The opposing idea being that you can just simulate your antenna 1 time with say 50 ohms, and then you can renormalize (without ever re-simulating) to any impedance you want and have the correct S parameters for any port impedance value. Thanks!
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Lumped Port Deembed
- HFSS libnvidia-ml.so too old or could not be found – Warning in slurm job output
- Hfss 3D pcb via capped and filled with epoxy
- Optimizing Via Impedance in Ansys HFSS 3D Layout Using Geometric Parameter Sweep
- AEDT Natural Convection with default correlation is failing solver initializatio
- STL Import Errors in HFSS After Cleaning in SpaceClaim
- Three-Phase Voltage Imbalances in dual stator electric generator
- Calc Error in Field Calculator after PyAEDT Analyze
- import file autocad 3d
- Co-simulation in Q3D, Icepak – meshing problem
-
4062
-
1487
-
1308
-
1156
-
1021
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.