-
-
March 23, 2020 at 8:53 pm
AkashVyas
SubscriberI was trying to solve this snap-fit problem but I'm getting these msgs every time ever time, I'm not sure what is the issue
The material for snap is polycarbonate and for the block it's steel
Â
these are my analysis and contact setting
and if I'm reducing the no of load steps or substeps it's not even converging till this point
Â
-
March 24, 2020 at 1:08 am
peteroznewman
SubscriberIt might be that convergence was easy up to this point, and now much, much smaller steps are needed to show equilibrium as the snap moves around that corner.Try to add Stabilization in the Nonlinear Controls under Analysis Settings. Also try much smaller elements around each corner.
Another suggestion is to treat this as a dynamic event and simulate this using Transient Structural.
Either way, it is going to take a long time to simulate.
-
March 24, 2020 at 2:49 pm
AkashVyas
SubscriberWhat stabilization settings should be used constant or reduce -
March 24, 2020 at 5:11 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberTry Reduce, but use more elements around each corner first, and use smaller time steps at the point in the simulation when the corners start to slide on each other.
-
March 25, 2020 at 7:23 pm
AkashVyas
Subscriber
sir, I have solved this problem with fine mesh and stabilization and also I have given 35 loadsteps this time for the same dispalcement last time it was 20 loadsteps. but still same issue
last time node count was 10525 and element count was 3301Â Â
and this time node count is 39903 and element count is 12757
this is the force convergence graph
-
March 25, 2020 at 7:38 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberWhat are the goals of your analysis?
What questions do you want the simulation to answer?
-
March 26, 2020 at 3:04 am
AkashVyas
SubscriberI have to find the mating force -
March 26, 2020 at 3:21 am
peteroznewman
SubscriberPlot the data so far...
Don't you have the mating force already?
Isn't the convergence problem when there is a pull in force after the resistance to mating is over?
-
March 26, 2020 at 4:44 am
AkashVyas
SubscriberI have the mating force, I just wanted to compare the FE generated force and hand calc force. This is just for practice
Sorry I don't understand what do mean "Isn't the convergence problem when there is a pull in force after the resistance to mating is over?"
Will it be okay if I plot the force till this point
-
March 26, 2020 at 1:48 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberYes, you can plot the results up to the point when the convergence failed. All the data is valid except for the last point that it adds "for debug purposes".
Please reply with the plot of Reaction Force Probe on the insertion.
-
March 26, 2020 at 4:37 pm
AkashVyas
SubscriberI'm using probe tool to plot force but It's not active/ working maybe because this problem is not solved completely
also, that file got corrupted so I'm again doing the simulation with less displacement till the point its converging
Â
-
March 26, 2020 at 4:59 pm
-
March 27, 2020 at 4:37 am
AkashVyas
SubscriberIs it possible to reduce the computation time and also file sizeÂ
It Took more than an hour to solve also file is quite large almost 4GB, I thought plain stress problem will take much less computational time and space then solid model
-
March 27, 2020 at 6:06 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberOkay, you have your insertion force graph.
Do you need the part where the snap goes around the corner and the force reverses from pushing to being pulled in as the snap closes?
Yes, it takes time to solve. Yes, it will take longer to solve a 3D model than a 2D plane stress model.
-
March 27, 2020 at 6:10 pm
AkashVyas
SubscriberYes, I also need that part, how to solve that partÂ
Should I solve that separately
-
March 27, 2020 at 6:18 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberJust continue the same analysis for another few hours. When convergence fails, take more substeps and make the elements smaller as necessary to continue convergence.
There are lots of tweaks that can be done on the Frictional Contact Details to help it out. You also should put in the Command Object
NEQIT,100
This will tell the solver to keep trying for 100 iterations before doing a bisection. Without that it will bisect in 26 iterations or less.
You are waiting longer than necessary by using small elements along the entire boundary. You only need small elements where the contact is occurring. Use large elements everywhere else.
You can also change the square to be a rigid part, then you won't get a mesh on the interior, only on the surface, but you have to use a joint to keep it fixed (or moving as the case may be).
-
March 27, 2020 at 6:25 pm
AkashVyas
SubscriberOkay, I will try again
-
- The topic ‘SnapFit Non-linear analysis Force Convergence Issue’ is closed to new replies.
-
4723
-
1565
-
1386
-
1242
-
1021
© 2026 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.







