We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
Photonics

Photonics

Topics related to Lumerical and more.

Current Mismatch in CHARGE vs HEAT

    • tz2589
      Subscriber

      Hi,

      I'm looking to find the thermal/electrical properties of a doped silicon bar with aluminum contacts using Lumerical CHARGE / HEAT. However, I am finding that the calculated currents through the contacts are drastically different in CHARGE and HEAT, despite using the same configuration and simulation region. I've looked through the Lumerical documentation and all of the CHARGE / HEAT simulation settings, but cannot seem to find the source of the mismatch. Below is a screenshot of the simulation setup:

       

      Below is the current found through one of the aluminum contacts in CHARGE:

       

      And below is the current calculated through the same contact in HEAT:

       

      I would appreciate any kind of support on this. Thank you!

       

      Best,

      Tobias

    • Afroditi Petropoulou
      Ansys Employee

      Dear Tobias,

       

      Thank you for contacting us.

       

      The equations that CHARGE solver and HEAT solver solve are different:

       

      CHARGE solver introduction – Ansys Optics

      HEAT solver introduction – Ansys Optics

       

      CHARGE solves self-consistently the system of equations describing the electrostatic potential (Poisson’s equation) and density of free carriers (the drift-diffusion equations). The drift-diffusion of carriers is not considered in HEAT solver, hence, in the case that semiconductors are included in the geometry, the I-V curves calculated from CHARGE and HEAT are not expected to be the same.

       

      Best regards,

      Afroditi

    • tz2589
      Subscriber

      Hi Afroditi, 

       

      Thank you very much for your response. That clears up a lot of my confusion. 

       

      In that case, is it possible to extract the thermal properties of a doped material using an applied voltage difference on two metal contacts? I'm interested in extracting the thermal profile of the silicon bar when a given voltage difference is applied. I have previously used the "Power" boundary condition, which assumes a fixed power from a surface, but would like to get a more realistic measure. 

       

      Thanks again,

      Tobias

    • Afroditi Petropoulou
      Ansys Employee

      Hello Tobias,

       

      You can run a self-consistent electro-thermal simulation with CHARGE and HEAT solvers in "coupled" mode. As explained in PIN Mach-Zehnder modulator – Ansys Optics example, in “coupled” mode the Joule heating is calculated giving more accurate results. Then you can export the temperature profile from a temperature monitor.

       

      Best regards,

      Afroditi

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.