-
-
December 16, 2024 at 2:34 pm
ll00023
SubscriberI used the Bilger's definition of mixture fraction to predict the coal combustion.Â
the volatile formula of PRB coal is C1.16H3.4O0.71N0.0741.
Since char combustion is a secondary factor to determine the coal flame, I only consider volatile flame here.
volatile contains nitrogen element, which doesn't affect the oxygen consumption; by referring Haifeng Wang 2023 's work, in the coupling function, nitrogen item could be eliminated.
so I can use eqn. 8.4-9 and 8.4-10.
the mixture fraction result is not showing Boundedness [0,1], Monotonicity. But stoichiometry preservation (0.146) is close to the flame location.
I assume this is due to the volatile release process. when using Eqn. 8.4-9, b_fuel - b_o = 2*Yc/Mc +0.5Yh/Mh+Yo/Mo, in which Yc = 0.148, Yh= 0.0361 from volatile , Yo=0.23 from oxidizer.
while for b, Yc is from the volatile in that cell, which is dependent upon the release process. I didn't find any solution for coal combustion.
how to make it right for coal combustion?
Thank you.
Â
Â
Â
-
December 18, 2024 at 3:26 pm
Ren
Ansys EmployeeAre you wanting to model coal combustion using Fluent? Which combusiton model are you considering? Why do you need to construct the Bilger mixture fraction?Â
Â
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
-
3862
-
1414
-
1241
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.