-
-
November 19, 2024 at 3:03 pmyingtaoSubscriber
Hi,
I am working on simulating the impact of a pedestrian human body model with a vehicle. In the simulation, the pedestrian is initially struck by the vehicle, causing the body to rotate around the front end of the vehicle. The vehicle comes to a stop after 200 ms. Following the impact, the pedestrian is expected to fall to the ground due to gravity. However, instead of falling, the pedestrian unexpectedly rises after 200 ms. I applied gravity to the entire model using the *LOAD_BODY_Z keyword, as shown in the code below, the unit is mm-s-ton. In the meanwhile, the energy curve showed suddenly kinetic energy drop at 0.28s, that's because of the vehicle was stopped at 0.28s. However the internal energy increased significantly after 0.28s, the head and pelvis velocity increased at the same time as well. Could you suggest how I can ensure the pedestrian falls to the ground as expected?
$
*LOAD_BODY_Z
$ Â Â LCID Â Â Â Â SF Â Â LCIDDR Â Â Â Â XC Â Â Â Â YC Â Â Â Â ZC Â Â Â CID
   1003    1.0     0
$*DEFINE_CURVE
$:
$: Cross-reference summary for Load-curve 1003
$: -----------------------------------------------
$:
$: Body load definition: Base Z acceleration vs time
$: X axis : Time            (Units: Time)
$: Y axis : Base Z acceleration     (Units: Acceleration)
$:
$: Usage: Transient analysis
$:
$HMCURVE Â Â 2 Â Â 2 LoadCurve_1003
$ Â Â LCID Â Â Â SIDR Â Â Â SFA Â Â Â SFO Â Â Â OFFA Â Â Â OFFO Â Â DATTYP Â Â LCINT
   1003     0    1.0    1.0    0.0    0.0     0     0
$ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â X Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Y
         0.0      -9806.6504
         1.5      -9806.6504
$Thanks!
-
November 20, 2024 at 5:54 amDennis ChenSubscriber
Â
Â
I don’t know for sure but I suspect you need to apply the gravity load during dynamic relaxation and not just in normal phase alone.  given SIDR=0 in your define_curve, maybe try to include DR and see if your model behaves correctly.
I have to say, I can’t 100% exactly follow your model just through text by reading it once so apologize if DR wasn’t the reason.Â
Â
Â
-
November 22, 2024 at 2:01 pmytianSubscriber
Gravity applied in such way should be positive, - the cordinate system going up.Â
-
November 22, 2024 at 11:57 pmyingtaoSubscriber
You're right, the load curve should be positive. I tested it using a simple model, it's working now. Thank you so much!
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- LS-DYNA Installation Issues with Student Workbench 2024 R2
- LS-Dyna CESE SMP d vs MPP d solver
- CESE solver – Ignition mechanism
- Cross-coupled stiffness elements in LS-DYNA
- Mathematical model generation stuck at 10%
- About combine different unconnected body into one part
- CONTROL_REFERENCE_CONFIGURATION
- Tiebreak using Segment set for contact b/w 20 noded Hexahedral elements
- shape memory alloy material in LS-DYNA
- CESE combustion model
-
1216
-
543
-
523
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.