TAGGED: ansys-aqwa
-
-
October 18, 2024 at 1:26 pmnguyenthithanhdiep1994Subscriber
Hello everyone,
I am currently researching the buoy with mooring lines. The configuration of the setup is below. The buoy is connected with a sonar sensor and mooring lines.
The mooring line includes 4 components. The 2nd component of the mooring line consists of a buoy. How can I define the mooring lines with 4 sections and a buoy?
I hope to receive your advice.
Thank you so much.
-
October 21, 2024 at 1:46 pmIngrid MAnsys Employee
Hello,Â
The nonlinear caternary allows you to do this; you can create for the same cable definition different sections with the same (or different) section types, length and specify whether this particular part of the cable is expected to touch down on the seabed.
I hope this helps.
Ingrid
-
October 24, 2024 at 5:20 amnguyenthithanhdiep1994Subscriber
Dear Ingrid M,
Thank you so much for your response. I defined it following the AQWA manual. However, it has a problem with the weight/Unit length input. One of the mooring line sections has a lightweight cable with a Mass/Unit Length of 0.478 kg/m in section 2. And I can define this section's properties. Is there any way to create a lightweight cable?
-
October 30, 2024 at 9:12 amIngrid MAnsys Employee
Hi,
for catenaries, the weight should be at least 1.025 kg/m2 (your density devided by 1000). You can also increase the equivalent cross-sectional area so that the overall buoyancy is correct.
I hope this helps.
-
November 12, 2024 at 3:05 amnguyenthithanhdiep1994Subscriber
Thank you so much for your response. I solved this problem. However, I have another problem with the yaw motion response in the time domain. I simulated only the case of wave direction of 180 degrees. However, the ship rotated continuously 1 unreasonable when the wave direction was 180 degrees as shown in the picture below. Theoretically, when the ship operates 180 degrees, yaw motion is almost non-existent. Is there has any way to reduce the yaw motion such as adding the torsional stiffness or something?
-
-
November 19, 2024 at 1:08 pmIngrid MAnsys Employee
Hi,
yes, to account for the viscous effect, you might want to add drag coefficients on the hull. Depending on the shape of your vessel, this could be along the degree of freedom that will be the most affected, such as in yaw, in sway of you have a slender hull, etc..Â
I hope this helps.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Script error Code: 800a000d
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
-
1301
-
591
-
544
-
524
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.