Static Structural vs ACP pre

- July 16, 2024 at 5:26 am
  
  Ro.hi
  Subscriber
  
  Hi Everyone,
  I have an Question. When simulating the stress-strain behavior of a tube using the ACP method, we observe discrepancies in the results compared to static structural analysis (without the ACP method).
  (material : Epoxy carbon woven (230Gpa) Wet)
  (force = 9.81N Y-axis)
- July 16, 2024 at 2:16 pm
  
  Ashish Khemka
  Forum Moderator
  
  Hi,
  I am assuming that the discrepancy is due to difference in material model/ modeling technique between the two. If you can elaborate on what you mean by ACP method then it might help to comment further.
  Regards,
  Ashish Khemka
- July 24, 2024 at 4:06 am
  
  Ro.hi
  Subscriber
  
  Basically, I have two hollow tube for bending testing and their dimension is same OD=16; ID=14& L=230mm. I try to simulate the tube under two methods Static Structural and ACP pre.
  In static structural, I applied material as Epoxy carbon woven (230Gpa) Wet. And I fixed one end of the tube and appling the force(9.81N) on the other end.
  And, In ACP-pre i tried to appling the 5-types of layer for laminating under 0°,45°,90°,-45°,0° and the thickness is 0.2mm per layer. After all process, I share file to Static Structural path.then I follow the same instruction for previous static structural way.