-
-
July 5, 2019 at 2:51 pm
mekafime
Subscriber -
July 5, 2019 at 6:01 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberJust because the surface stress has exceeded the material yield point does not mean the joint has failed. Maybe the standard looks at the average stress in a section, I don't know which standard you are talking about. The average stress through the wall thickness at the point you have labelled is much lower than the surface stress value shown on the label.
-
July 5, 2019 at 8:14 pm
-
July 5, 2019 at 8:19 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberI don't know what Cidect is.
-
July 5, 2019 at 8:51 pm
jj77
SubscriberNot sure about cidect, but typically EC3 for ultimate limit states are governed by equations giving say N1.Rd (or Nc,Rd for axial force in beams or Mc,Rd for bending and so on) which is the maximum force or moments (they are not based on VM stresses).
Â
Thus to kind of compare, one could look at the ultimate load of these welded joint. So including plasticity, push the joint and obtain the load displacement curve.
See here for an example (codes tend to be more conservative than the full NL FEA):
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252015001102143
Â
-
July 5, 2019 at 9:01 pm
mekafime
SubscriberHi,Â
Cidect is similar to EC3. Thanks,Â
-
- The topic ‘Interpret results’ is closed to new replies.
-
6034
-
1906
-
1425
-
1308
-
1021
© 2026 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.

