We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
Joël Danton
Subscriber

Concerning the forces results: The  horizontal forces are accurate enough compare to results obtained by an other software, but not for the verticale forces. Indeed if we focuse only on the bottom surface, when I ask for the lift force on this face in the report definition, the results is pretty big (~20000N). Thus, when I try to exctract only the force induce by static pressure (density*g*depth), by using EXPRESSION "AeraAve(StaticPressure,[bottomBC])*Surf.[m^2]" the plot shows almost the same results (~20000N), which  lets believe that the vertical force is induced mainly by the static pressure. When plotting the dynamic pressure (1/2*density*velocity^2) by the same way (EXPRESSION "AeraAve(StaticPressure,[bottomBC])*Surf.[m^2]"), it appears that the force is very low (~100N). Though, what was expected is that the dynamic pressure should induces at least a force oscillation of +/- 1000 N around 0 N. Do you know how could I easily plot this force induced by dynamic force only and that is maybe more correct than what I did ?