We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
General Mechanical

General Mechanical

Topics related to Mechanical Enterprise, Motion, Additive Print and more.

Modal Results not Responding to Changing Pre-Stress

    • Michael Fusaro
      Subscriber

      I am trying to apply moment to a beam at one end and solve for vibration modes.

      Each time I change the moment load at the free end of the beam, the modal solution outputs the exact same frequencies for the 20 modes solved. (Almost as if it is not accounting for the pre stress at all)

      When I try the same with an axial tensile load, the solved frequencies increase with increased load. For some reason they do not when I apply moment. Any advice is appreciated, thank you

    • peteroznewman
      Subscriber

      The Pre-Stress input to Modal calculates a new stiffness matrix from the solution of the Static Structural model. The axial tension causes the stiffness matrix to change significantly and that is seen in the Modal frequency.  It seems the moment load does not change the stiffness matrix.

      I believe the way Pre-Stress works is that it only uses the stiffness matrix, but it does not update the shape of the part prior to running Modal. Try to put a huge moment on a straight beam so that the deformed shape is a semicircle and see what happens in the Modal analysis.

      • Michael Fusaro
        Subscriber

        Thanks for your reply Peter.

        An additional question I have is, what might cause my 3-sigma equivalent stress from a random vibration to be much lower than the equivalent stress from the static structural pre-stress analysis?

        For example, I have a part at the end of my beam that exhibits high stresses under static structural loading (~300 MPa)

        When performing random vibration with the above pre-stressed static structural, the 3-sigma equivalent stress only reaches about ~40 MPa.

        I understand Random Vibration is a statistical result, but I cannot understand why the stress would be significantly lower than the static case. I just want to make sure I am interpreting these results correctly.

         

        Thanks in advance, 

        Michael 

        • peteroznewman
          Subscriber

          This discussion has links that describe how to combine stress from Static Structural and Random Vibration.

    • Erik Kostson
      Ansys Employee

       

      Hi

       

      It does use the deformed shape say obtained from a static analysis also (not ony the stress stiffness matrix) – just we can not see that in the modal results.

      There is an option to see the mode shapes relative the actual deformed shape:

      Under the Solution in the tree and Information set Mesh Source (beta) -> Result file

      All the best

      Erik

       

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Modal Results not Responding to Changing Pre-Stress’ is closed to new replies.