TAGGED: ansys-aqwa, ansysaqwa, aqwa
-
-
April 12, 2024 at 4:27 am
r.abbasi
SubscriberHi All,
I was comparing there different heaving bouys in AQWA.
in RD the corresponding freqency for maximum RAO in heave represents natural frequency.
ButÂ
in HD analysis the corresponding freqency for the Maximum Radiation Damping in Heave, is not equal to natural freqency.
Why?
-
April 12, 2024 at 8:48 am
Shuangxing Du
Ansys Employee(1) In HD analsyis, please set Generate Internal Lid as Yes in Advanced Options of the part, which will remove the irregular frequeicy effects and provide better and smoother results againt frequencies.
(2) Check the displacement value of your model, which should be positive, and equals to the mass/water density if the structure is at its equilibrium position. Also check the hydrostatic stiffness of heave-heave, which should be positive if the buoy is piercing water surface.Â
(3) The hydrodynamic damping and wave exciting force will also affect the maximum value of heave RAO amplitude. We cannot say that this maximum value must be at the natural frequency.
-
- The topic ‘AQWA_Problem in HD and RD’ is closed to new replies.
- The legend values are not changing.
- LPBF Simulation of dissimilar materials in ANSYS mechanical (Thermal Transient)
- Convergence error in modal analysis
- APDL, memory, solid
- How to model a bimodular material in Mechanical
- Meaning of the error
- Simulate a fan on the end of shaft
- Nonlinear load cases combinations
- Real Life Example of a non-symmetric eigenvalue problem
- How can the results of Pressures and Motions for all elements be obtained?
-
3862
-
1414
-
1236
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.