-
-
March 4, 2024 at 1:10 pmmehmetyaylaciinfoSubscriber
Hi,
I have done high cycle fatigue analysis (S-N Time Series) and obtained 4392 cycles. Should I do low cycle fatigue analysis (E-N Time Series) again?
-
March 6, 2024 at 2:44 pmdanielshawAnsys Employee
Probably. SN is only valid for high-cycle fatigue (HF) using elastic stresses.  A predicted fatigue life for a ductile metal of only 4392 cycles is probably indicating low-cycle fatigue (LCF) produced by plastic strains. The predicted life of 4392 cycles is probably conservative, but if you want a more accurate life prediction, you should use EN.
-
March 6, 2024 at 7:24 pmmehmetyaylaciinfoSubscriber
Yes, this analysis for Al7075-T6 and conservative. Certainty of survival is 95%Â
Thank you so much for answer
-
-
Viewing 1 reply thread
- The topic ‘Low Cycle Fatigue’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- Ayuda con Error: “Unable to access the source: EngineeringData”
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Error when opening saved Workbench project
- How to apply Compression-only Support?
- Geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements
- How to select the interface delamination surface of a laminate?
- Timestep range set for animation export
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
- Frictional No separation contact
- Elastic limit load, Elastic-plastic limit load
Top Contributors
-
1301
-
591
-
544
-
524
-
366
Top Rated Tags
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.