-
-
March 3, 2024 at 5:46 pmjavat33489SubscriberHi all.The question is this. I'm counting on fatigue. At the first stage, when I write to the binot file, singularities arise in the calculation. I would like to remove them from the binot file and d3plot file. Do I need some kind of filter for this or how can I edit these files after the calculation? For example, I want to remove all stresses above 500 MPa.
-
March 4, 2024 at 3:37 pmigandikoAnsys Employee
Hello, I don't think there is a way to rewrite binout/d3plot data with a stress cutoff. Perhaps you can either make the analysis stable or reduce termination time if the singularity occurs after a certain time.
Please take a look at *FATIGUE_LOADSTEP. LS-DYNA performs a fatigue calculation only for the stress / strain history extracted between TSTART and TEND defined in this card.
Note that *FATIGUE_ELOUT can be used to calculate fatigue results of a few elements in the model instead of the full model.
-
March 5, 2024 at 4:30 pmjavat33489Subscriber
Thanks for the answer. I understood you. What can you say about the MAT ADD EROSION card? Maybe it's worth removing singular elements during solution?
-
March 5, 2024 at 5:13 pmigandikoAnsys Employee
You can delete elements that are probematic, on the fly, to continue the solution. However, please refer the tips provided here (https://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/support/FAQ/instability.tips).
-
March 5, 2024 at 5:28 pmjavat33489SubscriberMaybe tell me from your experience? MAT ADD EROSION card?
-
March 5, 2024 at 6:19 pmigandikoAnsys Employee
*MAT_ADD_EROSION is primarily used to define general material failure criteria irrespective of material type, not for handling instability.
You can of course use *mat_add_erosion to delete elements that meet certain stress/strain cutoff or even minimum time step based deletion. The card supports several options. Please see the manual. However, you don't want element deletion to compromise the overall integrity of the analysis i.e. by deleting too many elements that could belong to primary load bearing stucture, unless the deletion makes sense from material failure point of view or for computational convenience that does not alter the analysis significantly while getting rid of distorted elements. I suggest you visually inspect d3plot animation at small intervals and check what is going on in the analysis that is causing the stresses to jump. The tips suggested in the link should help.
-
March 5, 2024 at 6:46 pm
-
March 5, 2024 at 7:25 pmigandikoAnsys Employee
If you just want to ignore those elements for fatigue calculations, why not use *FATIGUE_ELOUT card like I suggested earlier? With *FATIGUE_ELOUT, only the elements that are in elout binary database are used for fatigue calculation, rest are ignored. You can control the elements that are dumped to elout database using *DATABASE_HISTORY_SHELL/SOLID.
-
March 5, 2024 at 7:41 pmjavat33489Subscriber
-
March 5, 2024 at 7:44 pm
-
March 5, 2024 at 6:12 pmjavat33489Subscriber
If I used the MAT ADD EROSION card:
1. Is it enough to use only one SIGY parameter? The rest seem to be unnecessary or unknown. This parameter would indicate the voltage above which it should be removed.
2. Is it possible to turn on the MAT ADD EROSION card not immediately but after some time? For example, after half the calculation it turns on and starts working? -
March 5, 2024 at 6:21 pmigandikoAnsys Employee
- Yes, the card allows several options. You can ignore the ones you do not need.
- Please check if FAILTM parameter in *mat_add_erosion helps.
-
-
-
March 17, 2024 at 7:07 pmjavat33489Subscriber
I need help. Could you tell us in more detail how to do this?
-
March 18, 2024 at 8:07 pmigandikoAnsys Employee
It is not possible to exclude those elements from elout database without knowing the ids or (areas of those elements) beforehand. Did you try element deletion option?
-
March 19, 2024 at 1:57 amjavat33489Subscriber
Delete after calculation or during calculation? Can you tell me more please?
-
-
-
- The topic ‘Adjustment of stresses after calculation in LS-Dyna’ is closed to new replies.
- LS-DYNA Installation Issues with Student Workbench 2024 R2
- LS-Dyna CESE SMP d vs MPP d solver
- CESE solver – Ignition mechanism
- Cross-coupled stiffness elements in LS-DYNA
- About combine different unconnected body into one part
- Mathematical model generation stuck at 10%
- CONTROL_REFERENCE_CONFIGURATION
- Tiebreak using Segment set for contact b/w 20 noded Hexahedral elements
- shape memory alloy material in LS-DYNA
- CESE combustion model
-
1191
-
513
-
488
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.