Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
Photonics

Photonics

Topics related to Lumerical and more.

Problem in Designing Tunable graphene based metamaterial absorber design.

    • Kawshik
      Subscriber

      I've drawn the below figure but I got the absorbance very poor what is the problem during my design. Is any modification needed in this design?

      I also give the corresponding output of absorbance below. Please solve this problem.

    • Afroditi Petropoulou
      Ansys Employee

      Dear Kawshik,

       

      Could you please give me some more information on your design?

      What are the dimensions of your structure (FDTD area, thicknesses of the layers)?

      What properties did you use for the graphene material? In the material explorer, did graphene had the correct conductivity for the wavelength range that you are working (30um-90um)?

      For example, in Figure 1 of Graphene surface conductivity material model – Ansys Optics, you can see the properties of the graphene material to get the conductivity presented in Figure 2 which includes data for 10THz.

      Also, it would be better to extend the materials (Si, Au and SiO2) through the PML boundaries (Always extend structures through PML boundary conditions – Ansys Optics).

       

      Best regards,

      Afroditi

       

      Best regards,

      Afroditi

    • Kawshik
      Subscriber

      I use graphene model from materials explorer. In few papers i saw that authors are using only refractive index for Si, SiO2. I found the refractive index of Si & SiO2 but didn't find the exact refractive index of Au from the paper. 

      Besides I use extended PML layer. I also use separate mesh for graphene layer. Plz give me the full simulation procedure for this structure.

       

    • Afroditi Petropoulou
      Ansys Employee

      Dear Kawshik,

       

      In the graphene material from the material database, you can define the scattering rate, the chemical potential and the temperature as shown below:


      Did you use the default values or did you defined them to correspond to the correct conductivity for your frequency range?

      If you click on the “Go to Material Explorer” button shown above, you will see the conductivity vs wavelength for the graphene material. You need to define the above parameters to have the correct conductivity values for the desired wavelengths. For example, the default scattering rate and chemical potential values will give you the following conductivity in the wavelength range used in your simulation:


      If you change the values to the ones shown in Figure 1 of Graphene surface conductivity material model – Ansys Optics for broadband graphene conductivity, the conductivity in the wavelength range used in your simulation will now be the following:


      Hence, you need to be sure that the conductivity used in the simulation corresponds to the one that you are trying to simulate.

      In the material explorer you should also check that the rest of the materials also have the correct values in the wavelength range of interest. Some of the materials in the material library might have limited data in other frequency ranges (optical, NIR wavelengths). In this case you will need to specify the correct values for these materials.

       

      Concerning the setup of the simulation, I do not see anything wrong from the image that you shared. Do you have PML or periodic boundary conditions?

      In any case the structure should extend through the boundaries as shown below:

      For example, if your FDTD in x and y axis extends from -10um to 10um, you need to make the Si, Au and SiO2 layers larger (e.g. from -12um to 12um).

       

      Best regards,

      Afroditi

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Problem in Designing Tunable graphene based metamaterial absorber design.’ is closed to new replies.
[bingo_chatbox]