-
-
February 7, 2024 at 11:39 am
rohit_2301res52
SubscriberHi, While Analyzing Tunnel lining Beam-Spring model in Ansys Mechanical APDL. In the analysis two types of springs are provided. Normal springs are with compression capability only and tangential springs are acting in both tension and compression loadings. Large displacement has been considered in the analysis. This option in commercial software invokes geometric non-linearity, where updated geometry is considered in the subsequent iterations of finite element analysis. Considering geometric non-linearity will change the orientation of springs. Normal spring will not remain normal to the surface during the iterative finite element analysis. This will model the elastic bed stiffness incorrectly. Instead, analysis without geometric non-linearity shall be performed. As compression only spring elements requires non-linear analysis, number of time steps used in the analysis shall be greater than 1. What is your say on this? #ansys #tunnel
-
February 7, 2024 at 11:41 am
Erik Kostson
Ansys EmployeeDuplicate - use first post.
/forum/forums/topic/ansys-tunnel-beam-spring-model
Closing.
-
- The topic ‘Ansys tunnel beam Spring model’ is closed to new replies.
- The legend values are not changing.
- LPBF Simulation of dissimilar materials in ANSYS mechanical (Thermal Transient)
- Convergence error in modal analysis
- APDL, memory, solid
- Meaning of the error
- How to model a bimodular material in Mechanical
- Simulate a fan on the end of shaft
- Real Life Example of a non-symmetric eigenvalue problem
- Nonlinear load cases combinations
- How can the results of Pressures and Motions for all elements be obtained?
-
3977
-
1461
-
1272
-
1124
-
1021
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.