-
-
January 23, 2024 at 10:18 amuser deletedSubscriber
Hello Everyone,
I'm currently learning the SPH method.
I'm using an implicit solver.
I'm trying to solve the problem of contact of 5 bodies, one of which is SF
Contacts type: nodes-surface
Unfortunately, the contacts do not work; the bodies penetrate each other.
I would be grateful for advice/hints.Â
Thanks in advance
Best Valery
-
January 26, 2024 at 12:20 amJim DayAnsys Employee
Are you running implicit static or implicit dynamic?  What value have you assigned FORM in *CONTROL_SPH?  Which *MAT have you assigned the particles and does that material represent a solid material or a fluid?  Show me your *CONTROL_SPH data and your *CONTACT data.
-
January 27, 2024 at 4:14 pmuser deletedSubscriber
-
January 27, 2024 at 4:37 pm
-
January 29, 2024 at 4:30 pmJim DayAnsys Employee
Since you're using elastic material in this test, try FORM=0 in *CONTROL_SPH.  Set ITHK=1 in *CONTROL_SPH as well so that the radius of the particles are considered in the contact treatment.  Include *DATABASE_RCFORC will write histories of contact forces to rcforc; plot these forces to see if contact forces are being produced.  Set SOFT=1 in the *CONTACT input.
-
January 29, 2024 at 7:28 pmuser deletedSubscriber
thanks for the advice and kindness
but unfortunately there is no solution
*** Error 60038 (IMP+38)
   *********************************************************
   *                            *
   *        -  FATAL ERROR  -             *
   *                            *
   *  Type 3 data conflict encountered in while       *
   *   assembling elemental matrices.           *
   *  Invalid internal node number             *
   *   internal node number =   2059           *
   *   number of nodes    =   1226           *
   *  Please report this message to LST.          *
   *                            *
   ********************************************************* -
January 29, 2024 at 8:53 pmJim DayAnsys Employee
This may be an incompatibility between SPH and implicit.  In my own implicit test case, the SPH nodes never move. As an experiment, try using the explicit solver and report what happens.
Â
-
January 30, 2024 at 9:49 amuser deletedSubscriber
SPH and explicit solver work successfully.
-
- The topic ‘Contact FEM/SPH (implicit solver)’ is closed to new replies.
- LS-DYNA Installation Issues with Student Workbench 2024 R2
- LS-Dyna CESE SMP d vs MPP d solver
- Cross-coupled stiffness elements in LS-DYNA
- CESE solver – Ignition mechanism
- Mathematical model generation stuck at 10%
- About combine different unconnected body into one part
- Tiebreak using Segment set for contact b/w 20 noded Hexahedral elements
- shape memory alloy material in LS-DYNA
- CESE combustion model
- Initial Stress Shell Application and HistVarCosine in LS-DYNA
-
1301
-
591
-
544
-
524
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.