Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
Preprocessing

Preprocessing

Topics related to geometry, meshing, and CAD.

Effect of Stairstepping on numerical results

    • CatiaV5
      Subscriber

      Hi all,


      I was wondering what impact it has on the numerical results if stair stepping is occurring in the inflation layer. Especially in the area with the reduced area. Will it have a significant impact on the results


    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      That will depend on what is happening in that region, and what the cell quality is. In itself stair-stepping simply means you've got fewer layers in the inflation zone. 


      Please can you post the image in the text: staff are not permitted to open attachments. 

    • CatiaV5
      Subscriber
      The question was just general as I see the warning messages and did wonder. So would you say it is better to have a lot of inflation layers with stair stepping or less inflation layers but no stair stepping.

      Also I found a paper where Anysy Icem was used for the tet mesh generation with inflation layers. It stated that the 1st cell height is 1e-7m with the total extent of the 36 prismatic layers of 0.003m resulting in the non-uniform exponential expansion ratios normal to the wall of 1.21 near the wall and 1.35 at the edge of the prismatic layers.

      I do not understand why two growth rates are mentioned. I thought the growth rate in ICEM was constant. Do you by any chance know what this refers to? Or shall I open up another post?
    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      In your case I'd question why the inflation stops at that position: did you miss an edge in the selection? Otherwise it's still possibly OK depending on what the flow is doing in that area. 


      I suspect the two growth rates are for the inflation region and then in the tet region: but as I don't use ICEM CFD (I used to along time ago before tets and automatic blocking) I'm not sure. We're also assuming the paper terminology is correct! 

    • Keyur Kanade
      Ansys Employee

      do you have image of mesh from paper?

    • CatiaV5
      Subscriber

      Hi,


      yeah I do (see attached))

    • Keyur Kanade
      Ansys Employee

      so it is continuous prism layer. it does not have stairstepping. 


      it is recommended to avoid stairstep in such geometries. 


      so please check if you have missed any face in inflation definition in your case. 

    • Keyur Kanade
      Ansys Employee

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzoQ1WPZk74


       

    • CatiaV5
      Subscriber
      If you look at the profile it does not look continuous to me though. Or are those bumps not due to stairstepping?

      Is there a rule btw how to avoid stairstepping? I figured that if I decrease my face sizing and do not vhange the first layer height I will get stairstepping. I haven’t figured out yet what I will need to change to avoid this. Because when decreasing the 1st layer height I will need to increase the number of layers which then results often in stair stepping again.
    • Keyur Kanade
      Ansys Employee

      from the first image you have posted, i think you have missed some faces to define inflation. so you are getting stairstepping. 


      please cross check. 

Viewing 9 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Effect of Stairstepping on numerical results’ is closed to new replies.
[bingo_chatbox]