-
-
February 15, 2019 at 8:35 pm
kravky
SubscriberHello,
Â
i want to study modal analysis of thin plate subjected to tension. I would like to know, if SHELL 181 elements are right choice and if my mesh is good enough. i used curvature automatic meshing. it used mostly quad, but also some triangular elements
Â
If there is better choice of mesh, could You please tell me how to do it? Maybe something like this:Â -
February 20, 2019 at 12:00 pm
Rohith Patchigolla
Ansys EmployeeHello Kravky,Â
From ANSYS Help, shell181 documentaion:
"SHELL181 is suitable for analyzing thin to moderately-thick shell structures. It is a four-node element with six degrees of freedom at each node: translations in the x, y, and z directions, and rotations about the x, y, and z-axes. (If the membrane option is used, the element has translational degrees of freedom only). The degenerate triangular option should only be used as filler elements in mesh generation."
As it says, triangular option should only be used as filler elements in mesh generation.
In my opinion, your mesh looks fine.
Best regards,
Rohith
Â
-
- The topic ‘Best mesh for thin circular plate/membrane’ is closed to new replies.
- CONVERTING STL FILE IN TO SOLID
- The meshing algorithm cannot find matching topology
- Assiging one parameter as thinkness of few shell objects
- [ANSYS Meshing] how to activate curvature for a sizing in a script?
- How do I fix this irregular face meshing problem?
- ICEM O grid mesh for sloped pipe
- How to create a mapped mesh in a chain link model with stud.
- what is the best way to apply shear stress to a shell 181 element?
- Meshing Help – I keep getting errors. How would you tackle this geometry?
-
2132
-
918
-
599
-
591
-
483
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.