-
-
January 11, 2019 at 6:41 pm
JL1234
SubscriberStructural problems are generally much more computationally costly compared to heat flow problems. Why is that?Â
-
January 11, 2019 at 9:28 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberSolid elements for structural models have 3 degrees of freedom on each node (x,y,z displacement), while thermal models have only 1 degree of freedom on each node (temperature). There is a factor of 3 right there.
Small features in the geometry create stress concentrations that must be resolved with many small elements because we are interested in the maximum stress. Small features in the geometry can be meshed more coarsely in a thermal model because it doesn't create a maximum temperature that is of interest. There could be 3 times as many nodes in a structural model compared with a thermal model to get results that converge on the true solution.
Multiply 3 by 3 and the structural model is now 9 times more costly to compute the solution than the thermal model.
I expect other members may give other examples.
-
- The topic ‘Computational Cost’ is closed to new replies.
- The legend values are not changing.
- LPBF Simulation of dissimilar materials in ANSYS mechanical (Thermal Transient)
- Convergence error in modal analysis
- APDL, memory, solid
- How to model a bimodular material in Mechanical
- Meaning of the error
- Simulate a fan on the end of shaft
- Nonlinear load cases combinations
- Real Life Example of a non-symmetric eigenvalue problem
- How can the results of Pressures and Motions for all elements be obtained?
-
3872
-
1414
-
1241
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.