TAGGED: fdtd, initialization
-
-
October 6, 2023 at 1:29 amSeongcheol LeeSubscriber
I'm running a optimization algorithm in which each individual FDTD simulation is extremely short (~1s).
About 2 weeks ago, the "initializing" step started taking ~5 times longer than before, which slowed down my algorithm significantly.
Currently it takes about 20s for a 2D simulation with following spec:
Initialization and mesh: 164 MB
Running simulation: 83 MB
Data collection: 1 MB
Monitor data saved to fsp file: 682 kBI noticed my CPU utilization stays below 1% during the initialization step.
Is there any way to speed up this process?
(I tried addjob command and running simulations in batch, but initialization for each job takes the same amount of time.)
-
October 6, 2023 at 4:02 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
Please check your Resource settings. For small simulation file you may not need to use too many processes and threads. Please test and see how many are proper for the simulation.
If this does not help, please check if there are any background software running.
You may also consider to reboot the computer, or even do a clean installation: https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/5613618572947-Fixing-installation-or-licensing-issues
-
- The topic ‘FDTD – Initialization takes too long compared to how fast it used to be.’ is closed to new replies.
- Difference between answers in version 2024 and 2017 lumerical mode solution
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- Import material .txt file with script
- Trapezoidal ring
- Help for qINTERCONNECT
- Absorption cross-section of AuNR excited by prism-based TIR
- Issues with getting result from interconnent analysis script
- How to measure transmission coefficients on a given plane .
- Topology Optimization Error
-
1416
-
599
-
591
-
565
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.