-
-
September 18, 2023 at 4:18 amJacob EllisSubscriber
Hi everyone,
I see a lot of discussion of the benefits of using SOFT = 2 over SOFT = 0 or 1 but outside of the added computational complexity are there any obvious downsides to SOFT = 2? I feel like I want to move torwards using it as a default algorithm since my problems are often computationally small. Seems to be robust. Any thoughts on edge cases?
-
September 18, 2023 at 10:53 pmUshnish BasuAnsys Employee
SOFT=2 with SBOPT=5, DEPTH=55 works well in a wide variety of cases. Please see the section "About SOFT=2" in the manual for a detailed discussion of SOFT=2 behavior
-
Viewing 1 reply thread
- The topic ‘SOFT = 2 (Segment Based) Contact Downsides’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- LS-DYNA Installation Issues with Student Workbench 2024 R2
- LS-Dyna CESE SMP d vs MPP d solver
- CESE solver – Ignition mechanism
- Cross-coupled stiffness elements in LS-DYNA
- About combine different unconnected body into one part
- Mathematical model generation stuck at 10%
- CONTROL_REFERENCE_CONFIGURATION
- Tiebreak using Segment set for contact b/w 20 noded Hexahedral elements
- shape memory alloy material in LS-DYNA
- CESE combustion model
Top Contributors
-
1191
-
518
-
488
-
225
-
209
Top Rated Tags
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.