-
-
August 3, 2023 at 11:57 amAJAY GUNTISubscriberI'm working with ANSYS fluent to run the DPM simulation of Al2O3 nanofluid to perform the sedimentation analysis. I have a problem setting up the surface inlet injection of al2o3 nanoparticle as a material. I couldn't able to find it under material section in injection but i see other material like anthracite, etc..ÂAny suggestions would be really helpful?ÂThank you
-
August 3, 2023 at 2:06 pmRobForum Moderator
You'll need to find the properties in literature and then add them yourself. It's the same process as altering any material, you just start with the anthacite material.Â
Note, I recommend doing some reading: sedimentation with DPM may not be the best approach.Â
-
August 3, 2023 at 2:15 pmAJAY GUNTISubscriber
Hi Rob, thanks for your reply. I have the thermo-physical properties of the nanoparticle. I'm not sure how to add. can you please explain step by step procedure for that. At the moment i have completed Eulerian -Eulerian approch and i have added al2o3 under fluid section of materials. Are you suggesting me to add al2o3 nanoparticle under solid domain.Â
Â
Can you please recommed me which model is better suited for nanoparticle sediemntation process. Thankyou
-
August 3, 2023 at 2:20 pmRobForum Moderator
You just alter one of the existing materials and when asked if you want to overwrite say no. Â
Which of Eulerian and DPM are you using? Both have pros and cons, so please explain what you're trying to model in more detail. After you've read around the models (documentation, Learning and other threads), which do you think you should use?Â
-
August 3, 2023 at 2:34 pmAJAY GUNTISubscriber
Hi, Basically im trying to improve the heat transfer perfomance using sedimentation by changing the design based on the results of heated pipe. I'm using implicit Eulerian - Eulerian and Eulrian-lagrangian models. I have read the documentation and i see both models are good fit but interms of accuracy DPM is btter and comes with compuational cost.
So, from your previous recomandation , are you suggesting me to change e.g., antracite properties ? because clearly, even after adding or changing in material section, it doent reflect on injection material section? Please take a look at the pictures. Thanks
Â
-
August 3, 2023 at 4:03 pmRobForum Moderator
The solid phase in Eulerian is a "fluid". The DPM material is separate.Â
-
August 3, 2023 at 4:23 pmAJAY GUNTISubscriber
Are you taking about the inert particle attached. First I have enabled created a injection and seclected as dummy material which is anthracite. After that i looked into materials section and i see a new inert particle and when changing the properties i dont see thermal conductivty ? can you please suggest me if im doing wrong or right?
-
August 4, 2023 at 8:39 amAJAY GUNTISubscriber
Hi rob, i have managed to add a new material under inert particle but why is the thermal conductivity is not showing in inert particles from previous picture even after i enabled the energy equation?
-
August 4, 2023 at 8:53 amRobForum Moderator
Check the DPM model theory, why would you need thermal conductivity of a point mass?Â
-
August 4, 2023 at 8:54 amAJAY GUNTISubscriber
ok thanks for your comments. All clarified.
-
- The topic ‘Discrete Phase Model Al2O3 nanofluid Injection problem?’ is closed to new replies.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Script error Code: 800a000d
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Encountering Error in Heterogeneous Surface Reaction
-
1191
-
513
-
488
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.