We’re putting the final touches on our new badges platform. Badge issuance remains temporarily paused, but all completions are being recorded and will be fulfilled once the platform is live. Thank you for your patience.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Missing Mach Contour

    • felice_lucivero
      Subscriber

      Hello everybody,

      I am running a CFD simulation of a supersonic air intake, with a thermally and calorically perfect air gas flowing through it.

      I set the ideal gas tag in the material properties.

      I have also checked that the Mach number is present in the Data File Quantities.

      I can't find out why it is missing when I try to plot the contours, either in Fluent and in the Post-Processing option.

      I hope you can help me out with this.

    • Luca B.
      Forum Moderator

      I tested with 2023R2 version and I can see Mach Number in the post processing tools into Fluent. 

      Can you check if you are using the right Material inside the "fluid" Cell zone? If you use a wrong or different material the Mach Number could not be visible.

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

         

        Yes, the material should be properly set; it is air, I attached a snapshot.

        Is it possible that the error arises from the workflow?

        Thank you for replying.

         

    • Luca B.
      Forum Moderator

      Please double check also Cell zone Condition if the material used is "air". 

      Your workflow seems to be right. Are you experiences your problem with CFD- Post also?

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

        The cell zone condition seems to be fine as well.

        Yes, I'm experiecing the same issue also in CFD-Post.

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      Please can you post a plot of the velocity contour? 

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

        Here it is:

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      It should be there. What are you seeing in the panel?

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

        Thank you Rob, I solved it.

        I switched to a density based model and imposed autosave every 100 iterations.

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      That shouldn't make a difference: pressure based is good for Mach 2-3 and higher in some scenarios. 

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

        I am actually trying to replicate the reuslts of a paper; in this latter they imposed a density-based solver, that's why I switched.

        Probably the autosave option was not swicthed on, I don't know.

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Missing Mach Contour’ is closed to new replies.