Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Missing Mach Contour

    • felice_lucivero
      Subscriber

      Hello everybody,

      I am running a CFD simulation of a supersonic air intake, with a thermally and calorically perfect air gas flowing through it.

      I set the ideal gas tag in the material properties.

      I have also checked that the Mach number is present in the Data File Quantities.

      I can't find out why it is missing when I try to plot the contours, either in Fluent and in the Post-Processing option.

      I hope you can help me out with this.

    • Luca B.
      Forum Moderator

      I tested with 2023R2 version and I can see Mach Number in the post processing tools into Fluent. 

      Can you check if you are using the right Material inside the "fluid" Cell zone? If you use a wrong or different material the Mach Number could not be visible.

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

         

        Yes, the material should be properly set; it is air, I attached a snapshot.

        Is it possible that the error arises from the workflow?

        Thank you for replying.

         

    • Luca B.
      Forum Moderator

      Please double check also Cell zone Condition if the material used is "air". 

      Your workflow seems to be right. Are you experiences your problem with CFD- Post also?

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

        The cell zone condition seems to be fine as well.

        Yes, I'm experiecing the same issue also in CFD-Post.

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      Please can you post a plot of the velocity contour? 

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

        Here it is:

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      It should be there. What are you seeing in the panel?

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

        Thank you Rob, I solved it.

        I switched to a density based model and imposed autosave every 100 iterations.

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      That shouldn't make a difference: pressure based is good for Mach 2-3 and higher in some scenarios. 

      • felice_lucivero
        Subscriber

        I am actually trying to replicate the reuslts of a paper; in this latter they imposed a density-based solver, that's why I switched.

        Probably the autosave option was not swicthed on, I don't know.

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Missing Mach Contour’ is closed to new replies.