Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Are CFL-Number, Courant-Number and Flow-Courant-Number the same thing?

    • oll5hbdfk
      Subscriber

      Hello everyone,

      the title is the question.

      Depending on what I choose in fluent under Setup-General and Solution-Methods, fluent may ask for a Courant-Number or a Flow-Courant-Number. Additionally in the documentation I find the term CFL-Number (e.g. Fluent 2021R1 Theory Guide 28.4.4.2 Under-Relaxation of Equations). Do these terms mean the same thing? I know that they are closely related, but are there small but decisive differences or do they mean exactly the same?

    • SRP
      Ansys Employee

       

      Hi,

      CFL-Number, Courant Number, and Flow-Courant-Number are all interchangeable words.

      Thank you

       

    • DrAmine
      Ansys Employee

      Yes.

    • DrAmine
      Ansys Employee

      The CFL number used for the Coupled Solver is however something totally different: you should rather interpret it as a sort of under-relaxation has nothing to do with temporal evolution or discreization rather to make matrix more diagonally dominated.

      • oll5hbdfk
        Subscriber

        OK, so the CFL number when using coupled means something different than the CFL number when using a segregated solver. But "coupled CFL" and "coupled Courant number" is the same. Do I get this right?

    • DrAmine
      Ansys Employee

      The CFL number used as Numerical Method Input has nothing to do with real temporal discretization and time evolution of the solution.

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Are CFL-Number, Courant-Number and Flow-Courant-Number the same thing?’ is closed to new replies.
[bingo_chatbox]