TAGGED: contact-target, fluent, moving-reference-frame
-
-
November 21, 2022 at 1:24 pm
Kilian Nuss
SubscriberHey everyone,
what are the settings to create a contact pair / connection between two geometries in Fluent Meshing / Space Claim like shown in the picture?
Or otherwise how can I be able to "Manual Create" mesh interfaces between two cell zones in respect of the geometry (with voids) seen in the picture?
My aim is that the cell zone of the big pipe is rotationg along the x-axis by a moving reference frame. The wall of the big pipe will be stationary to the absolut reference and the inside of the pipe is moving relative to adjacent cell zone. The small pipe is stationary.
Thanks you in advance.
-
November 22, 2022 at 3:59 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorIf it's a reference frame you want two volumes that are connected: so the common face will be curved to fit the "red" cylinder. In DM you want a multibody part and from SpaceClaim "share topology". You'll finish up with an interior surface. If you want sliding mesh then the above contact is correct assuming the "blue" end has the same shape as the red face.Â
-
November 23, 2022 at 12:48 pm
Kilian Nuss
SubscriberHey Rob,
thanks for the quick response.
The blue end and the red pipe do have the same shape.
However, I still got some follow-up questions.Â
Can I create the "share topology" in Space Claim as well as in Fluent Meshing?
I am right in the assumption, that you do not need a Mesh Interface if you apply "share topology"?
If I would do a transient analysis, I would need a sliding mesh. In this case, how would I be able to create the above contact? -
November 23, 2022 at 1:06 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorDo ShareTopo in SC as it's more reliable. It's also one less step in Fluent Meshing for whenever you do a mesh update.Â
Correct, assuming the faces connect then you'll have an interior face as opposed to two interface surfaces.Â
We can run mrf in steady or transient: sliding is transient only. The reason for using one of the other is whether the rotation changes something physical in the flow. Ie if it's a mixing tank impellor and there's a close pass between the blade and baffles you need sliding mesh. Otherwise the averaging from mrf is fine, and it's computationally cheaper.Â
-
November 23, 2022 at 1:51 pm
Kilian Nuss
SubscriberThank you very much, it helped me a lot.
-
- The topic ‘Creating a contact pair between to geometries/fluids in Fluent’ is closed to new replies.
- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
-
3892
-
1414
-
1241
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.