TAGGED: fluent, Fluent-boundary-conditions
-
-
November 18, 2022 at 9:29 am
George Joseph Thomas
SubscriberI have a situation where I know only the pressure boundary conditions at the inlet and outlet (design of a nozzle). I have been hearing from my day one with CFD not to apply pressure BCs on all boundaries. Just to make sure, I calculated the flow through a simple tube with pressure inlet and outlet conditions and compared the results with the experimental results (obtaines using LDA) and the difference was around 7 % which for my application is a top-class result. So, is it okey to apply pressure BCs at all boundaries in Fluent or is it not recommended?
-
November 18, 2022 at 10:49 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorWith all pressure boundaries the mass flow becomes part of the solution. Given the density is also varying we get a fairly nasty problem in a numerical sense. Ie if density alters because of local pressure, the flow velocity changes as does the mass flow: which variable is the one to mess with to get the defined pressure drop.Â
What you plan is OK, but be aware of the potential for a stiff solution. Nozzles tend to be OK, but adding in shocks can complicate things. If you have LDA so know the velocity, can you use a velocity inlet then compare the pressure drops?Â
-
November 21, 2022 at 9:26 am
George Joseph Thomas
SubscriberYeah, thank you for the insight, but I do not have the a physical nozzle yet - is still in the development phase. When I try pressure boundaries, I see a covergence problem with continuity. I suppose this is what you meant. Let me know if you have any other suggestions. Meanwhile, I try velocity BC for inlet and check the pressure drop between inlet and outlet - if that corresponds to my required pressure difference. That should work too, right?
Thanks again!
-
November 22, 2022 at 11:57 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorI'd need to see images to comment on the residuals, both of the flow field (contours) and residual plots. Given how stiff these solutions can be, you may need a good initial condition (not hybrid) to get the solution going.Â
For fixed density systems it's common to run a velocity inlet, pressure outlet and then compare the pressure drop & mass flow with experimental results. The typical graph is a full experimental curve of pressure v flow with selected "points" from the CFD results. I did that when publishing some work on inhaler studies.Â
-
November 23, 2022 at 10:21 am
George Joseph Thomas
SubscriberI am in the middle of some calculations. I will get back to you with the pictures in a while. I am tring a couple of different initial conditions and BCs, and understanding the influence on the flow. Intial conditions seems to affect my convergence drastically.
Thanks for your inputs.Â
-
- The topic ‘Fluent simulation with only pressure boundary conditions’ is closed to new replies.
- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
-
3912
-
1414
-
1256
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.