-
-
July 26, 2022 at 6:38 pm
patrickm7995
SubscriberI have a thin plate with the bottom surface receiving solar flux, and the other surfaces being fully transparent and the inside of the geometry being air with very low (1e-5) density.
This bottom wall was set to 0 transmissivity and 0 absorptivity for this case, so it was expected that the solar radiation coming in (1377 W/m2) would be split between reflectivity in the IR and visible, 688.5 W/m2, which occured.
However, the absorbed visible solar flux map was also showing a value, which was unexpected. The absorbed IR was as expected, 0 W/m2.Â
Does anyone have any reasons this may be occuring? Thank you.
-
July 28, 2022 at 6:13 pm
SVV
Ansys EmployeeHi,
Can you please check your settings again?
Please note absorbed visible solar flux is not evalueted for opaque surface.
Â
-
July 28, 2022 at 7:11 pm
patrickm7995
SubscriberThank you for your reply. Sorry, I am confused: opaque surfaces do not have absorbed solar flux?
-
-
October 13, 2022 at 3:50 am
li can
Subscriberi have the same confusing , how to set opaque surface condition to absorb solar flux ?Â
-
- The topic ‘Absorbed Visible Solar Flux — Unexpected Results?’ is closed to new replies.
-
5014
-
1681
-
1387
-
1248
-
1021
© 2026 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.



