-
-
October 4, 2021 at 2:26 pm
GeorgM
SubscriberI want to have all the radiated field of an antenna turned into an incident wave. An obvious way would be to place a perfect E sphere around the antenna. But this doesn't do the job as perfect E (and H) boundaries change the rotation sense for circular waves. So the backscattered wave is different from the incident wave and this is not what I want.
I could save the far field in a *.ffd file. But I see no way for the reversal as there is no H in this file. It seems to be always outgoing.
For the near field this might be easier. I can save the (radiating) near field on a sphere surrounding my antenna in an *.nfd file. Then I calculate E:=conj(E) and H:=-conj(H) with some hand written script and then create a *.nfd file with the new data. This is now the reverted field. Then I take this file as "external link" near field excitation.
Are there smarter ways to do this? Can I revert the field without the cumbersome way over manipulated *.nfd files? Is it possible to revert the far field in a similar way and use it as excitation?
Thanks
October 4, 2021 at 11:52 pmAndyJP
Subscriberrevert? Ah.. I was trying to comprehend what you want to reach... are you speaking about reverting the Poynting vector in the captured data file? Thinking about that, probably some matlab scripting is required. still don't get why it is needed, but anyway, it is not an object of manipulation in the field calc.
October 5, 2021 at 5:10 amGeorgM
SubscriberYes, I want to revert the Poynting vector. But in such a way, that a RHCP wave remains RHCP (and vice versa) and doesn't change the rotation sense. This cannot be done with perfect E or H. In addition, the sphere would have to be aligned perfectly to the wave front.
The purpose is a longer story. I want to define a figure of merit for UWB antennas. It should reflect the similarity between the radiated pulse and the input pulse. This similarity is usually different in every direction. But I want a single number for the whole antenna in order to have some parameter for optimization.
October 5, 2021 at 5:36 pmPraneeth
Bbp_moderator
I am not sure if this helps or not. Did you try using the field calculator?
It is possible to import the far field data as a source into HFSS. There you can make use of field calculator to extract the resulting fields.
Best regards.
October 6, 2021 at 2:27 amAndyJP
Subscriberisn't the field calc a postprocessing layer? And it can not be applied when exporting. So I do not see a way to use it for the purpose defined. correct me if I am mistaken.
Viewing 4 reply threads- The topic ‘Is it possible to “revert” a near or far field?’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussionsTop Contributors-
3492
-
1057
-
1051
-
965
-
942
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-

Ansys Assistant

Welcome to Ansys Assistant!
An AI-based virtual assistant for active Ansys Academic Customers. Please login using your university issued email address.

Hey there, you are quite inquisitive! You have hit your hourly question limit. Please retry after '10' minutes. For questions, please reach out to ansyslearn@ansys.com.
RETRY