TAGGED: mechanical, modal-analysis
-
-
September 17, 2020 at 7:41 pm
Cheta Rathod
Ansys EmployeeThis could be due to the bonded contacts with large gaps present in the Modal analysis. Gap/Penetration at bonded contact adds extra stiffness to the model in Modal Analysis when the contact formulation is set to program controlled (penalty method).Â
Background: With large gaps, Bonded contacts using penalty methods can have accuracy issues. There is a warning issued for the user to either clean-up the model using cnch.adjust or morph or switch to MPC.Â
Warning message from the output is copied below.Â
**WARNING*: The initial penetration/gap is relatively large. Bonded/no separation option may cause an accuracy issue. Switch to MPC algorithm or you may use the CNCHECK,ADJUST/MORPH command to move the contact nodes towards the target surface.  Â
Resolution: Change the bonded contact formulation with these warnings to MPC formulation. This should give zero frequency modes for the unconstrained DOFs. As a check, compare higher frequency modes using both MPC and penalty contact formulations. There should be minor changes in the higher frequencies for the same mode shapes.
September 21, 2020 at 12:07 pmAniket
Forum ModeratorThanks, Cheta for sharing this!
-Aniket
How to access Ansys help links
Guidelines for Posting on Ansys Learning Forum
September 24, 2020 at 4:30 pmdlooman
Ansys EmployeeThis issue only affects the rigid body rotational modes. The penalty based contact across an open gap acts like a rotational constraint.
Viewing 2 reply threads- The topic ‘Why dont I get zero frequency modes in a Modal analysis for the DOFs that are not constrained?’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussionsTop Contributors-
3427
-
1057
-
1051
-
896
-
892
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-