-
-
July 11, 2025 at 7:22 am
singh.112
SubscriberHI all,
I am working on modelling self-excited thermoacoustic instability in gas turbine combustor. I am using FGM combustion model with LES. However I am unable to capture any periodic behavious from the simulations as shown in experiments. With the same boundary conditions when I tried of using EDC with URANS, I was able to get periodic behaviour of the flame. Running EDC is computationaly very expensive I wanted to run FGM. Any help will be higly apprecited.Â
Thanks in advance.Â
Â
-
July 14, 2025 at 3:15 pm
Ren
Ansys EmployeeHello,
Did you activate the "Compressibility Effects" PDF option in the Species model dialog box?
Are you using the "Turbulent Flame Speed" turbulence-chemistry interaction method?
Â
-
July 14, 2025 at 3:27 pm
singh.112
SubscriberHello Ren,Â
Thanks for your response.Â
I did try the compressibility effects but it was giving periodic signal for even stable case. After seing the results, I went through the suerguide where it was mentioned that for significant pressure changes only we should use compressibility effects. I am not sure what should be considered significant pressure variation. Yes I did try turbulent flame speed approach but without compressibility effects. Without compressibility effects, I did not get any periodic signals.Â
Â
Â
Â
-
July 14, 2025 at 3:38 pm
Ren
Ansys EmployeeFor thermoacoustics, the pressure-density coupling is important. So, the compressibility effects option is necessary.
The user guide is referring to combustion applications involving compressible flows (higher Mach number values).Â
Â
-
July 14, 2025 at 4:17 pm
singh.112
SubscriberOkay I will just give a try one more time with turbulent flame speed.Â
Should I use ZIMONT or PETERS approach ?Â
Â
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
3472
-
1057
-
1051
-
934
-
902
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.