{"id":165565,"date":"2023-03-17T09:00:39","date_gmt":"2023-03-17T09:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/"},"modified":"2023-07-31T12:31:30","modified_gmt":"2023-07-31T12:31:30","slug":"my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution","status":"publish","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/","title":{"rendered":"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain &#8220;hot spots&#8221; are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>1- Although the radiosity method resolves the non-linearity in one substep, it is sometimes of benefit to force a radiosity problem to do two substeps.     2 &#8211; The radiosity equations are solved with the Gauss-Seidel method by default, and the default convergence (TOLER on the RADOPT command) is 0.1. This tolerance is applied to the rate of change of the solution; however, sometimes the method only very slowly approaches the solution and terminates too quickly. Changing this value to .0001 will force more GS iterations. One can replace the GS method with the direct solver, but this is not advisable for 3D problems or for very-large 2D problems.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-165565","topic","type-topic","status-publish","hentry","topic-tag-4653","topic-tag-mechanical-apdl-f-ansys","topic-tag-structural-and-thermal","topic-tag-structural-mechanics","topic-tag-thermal"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"1- Although the radiosity method resolves the non-linearity in one substep, it is sometimes of benefit to force a radiosity problem to do two substeps. 2 - The radiosity equations are solved with the Gauss-Seidel method by default, and the default convergence (TOLER on the RADOPT command) is 0.1. This tolerance is applied to the\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ansys Knowledge | Ansys Innovation Space\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain \u201chot spots\u201d are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution? | Ansys Knowledge\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"1- Although the radiosity method resolves the non-linearity in one substep, it is sometimes of benefit to force a radiosity problem to do two substeps. 2 - The radiosity equations are solved with the Gauss-Seidel method by default, and the default convergence (TOLER on the RADOPT command) is 0.1. This tolerance is applied to the\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-17T09:00:39+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-31T12:31:30+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain \u201chot spots\u201d are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution? | Ansys Knowledge\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"1- Although the radiosity method resolves the non-linearity in one substep, it is sometimes of benefit to force a radiosity problem to do two substeps. 2 - The radiosity equations are solved with the Gauss-Seidel method by default, and the default convergence (TOLER on the RADOPT command) is 0.1. This tolerance is applied to the\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Topics\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Topics\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"structural-mechanics\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"structural-mechanics\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain &#8220;hot spots&#8221; are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution?\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Topics\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain &#8220;hot spots&#8221; are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution?\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"structural-mechanics\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ansys Knowledge\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\\\/\",\"name\":\"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain \\u201chot spots\\u201d are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution? | Ansys Knowledge\",\"description\":\"1- Although the radiosity method resolves the non-linearity in one substep, it is sometimes of benefit to force a radiosity problem to do two substeps. 2 - The radiosity equations are solved with the Gauss-Seidel method by default, and the default convergence (TOLER on the RADOPT command) is 0.1. This tolerance is applied to the\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-17T09:00:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-31T12:31:30+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ansys Knowledge\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain \u201chot spots\u201d are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution? | Ansys Knowledge","description":"1- Although the radiosity method resolves the non-linearity in one substep, it is sometimes of benefit to force a radiosity problem to do two substeps. 2 - The radiosity equations are solved with the Gauss-Seidel method by default, and the default convergence (TOLER on the RADOPT command) is 0.1. This tolerance is applied to the","canonical_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/#listItem","name":"Topics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Topics","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/#listItem","name":"structural-mechanics"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/#listItem","position":3,"name":"structural-mechanics","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/#listItem","name":"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain &#8220;hot spots&#8221; are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution?"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/#listItem","name":"Topics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/#listItem","position":4,"name":"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain &#8220;hot spots&#8221; are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution?","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/#listItem","name":"structural-mechanics"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#organization","name":"Ansys Knowledge","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/","name":"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain \u201chot spots\u201d are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution? | Ansys Knowledge","description":"1- Although the radiosity method resolves the non-linearity in one substep, it is sometimes of benefit to force a radiosity problem to do two substeps. 2 - The radiosity equations are solved with the Gauss-Seidel method by default, and the default convergence (TOLER on the RADOPT command) is 0.1. This tolerance is applied to the","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2023-03-17T09:00:39+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-31T12:31:30+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#website","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/","name":"Ansys Knowledge","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Ansys Knowledge | Ansys Innovation Space","og:type":"article","og:title":"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain \u201chot spots\u201d are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution? | Ansys Knowledge","og:description":"1- Although the radiosity method resolves the non-linearity in one substep, it is sometimes of benefit to force a radiosity problem to do two substeps. 2 - The radiosity equations are solved with the Gauss-Seidel method by default, and the default convergence (TOLER on the RADOPT command) is 0.1. This tolerance is applied to the","og:url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/","article:published_time":"2023-03-17T09:00:39+00:00","article:modified_time":"2023-07-31T12:31:30+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain \u201chot spots\u201d are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution? | Ansys Knowledge","twitter:description":"1- Although the radiosity method resolves the non-linearity in one substep, it is sometimes of benefit to force a radiosity problem to do two substeps. 2 - The radiosity equations are solved with the Gauss-Seidel method by default, and the default convergence (TOLER on the RADOPT command) is 0.1. This tolerance is applied to the"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"165565","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2025-10-17 22:18:42","updated":"2026-07-29 17:27:40","ai":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/\" title=\"Topics\">Topics<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/\" title=\"structural-mechanics\">structural-mechanics<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tMy thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain \u201chot spots\u201d are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution?\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge"},{"label":"Topics","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/"},{"label":"structural-mechanics","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/"},{"label":"My thermal solution for a problem using the Radiosity Method looks physically plausible, but certain &#8220;hot spots&#8221; are not in the expected location. What ways exist to refine the solution?","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/my-thermal-solution-for-a-problem-using-the-radiosity-method-looks-physically-plausible-but-certain-hot-spots-are-not-in-the-expected-location-what-ways-exist-to-refine-the-solution\/"}],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_wp_page_template":["default"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["3\/15\/2023 20:20"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27795"],"_bbp_author_ip":["23.56.168.180"],"_btv_view_count":["637"],"siebel_km_number":["836990"],"product_version":["11"],"km_published_date":["2008-12-06T00:00:00.000Z"],"family":["Structural Mechanics"],"application_name":["Mechanical APDL (f. ANSYS)"]},"test":"articlesansys-com"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/165565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/165565\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}