{"id":165420,"date":"2023-03-17T09:00:15","date_gmt":"2023-03-17T09:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/"},"modified":"2023-07-31T12:31:13","modified_gmt":"2023-07-31T12:31:13","slug":"i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why","status":"publish","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/","title":{"rendered":"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN&#8217;s. Why?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It is expected that the pressure impulse calculated by AUTODYN is less than that calculated analytically by a small percentage. The main reason that some analytical models over-predict the impulse is that they often do not account for the negative phase of pressure, where absolute pressure is less than the ambient pressure. If you plot the pressure time history, you will find that there is always a negative phase in the curve. AUTODYN takes the negative phase into account and thus it is in a better agreement with experiment data. Besides that, you also need to make sure you have a correct amount of explosive in the part. You can find the mass of the explosive in the AUTODYN print file &#8220;&#8221;ident.prt&#8221;&#8221;. If 1D wedge model is used, you need to adjust the external radius of HE or the material density because a 1D wedge does not allow zero internal radius of HE. If the HE mass in the print file is less than it should be, you need to increase the external radius or the material density to compensate the mass loss. You also need a fine mesh in the HE part. A coarse mesh will under-predict the overpressure and thus get a lower value of impulse.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-165420","topic","type-topic","status-publish","hentry","topic-tag-4431","topic-tag-autodyn","topic-tag-explicit-dynamics-explicit-autodyn","topic-tag-general","topic-tag-structural-mechanics"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"It is expected that the pressure impulse calculated by AUTODYN is less than that calculated analytically by a small percentage. The main reason that some analytical models over-predict the impulse is that they often do not account for the negative phase of pressure, where absolute pressure is less than the ambient pressure. If you plot\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ansys Knowledge | Ansys Innovation Space\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN\u2019s. Why? | Ansys Knowledge\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It is expected that the pressure impulse calculated by AUTODYN is less than that calculated analytically by a small percentage. The main reason that some analytical models over-predict the impulse is that they often do not account for the negative phase of pressure, where absolute pressure is less than the ambient pressure. If you plot\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-17T09:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-31T12:31:13+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN\u2019s. Why? | Ansys Knowledge\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"It is expected that the pressure impulse calculated by AUTODYN is less than that calculated analytically by a small percentage. The main reason that some analytical models over-predict the impulse is that they often do not account for the negative phase of pressure, where absolute pressure is less than the ambient pressure. If you plot\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Topics\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Topics\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"structural-mechanics\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"structural-mechanics\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN&#8217;s. Why?\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Topics\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN&#8217;s. Why?\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"structural-mechanics\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ansys Knowledge\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\\\/\",\"name\":\"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN\\u2019s. Why? | Ansys Knowledge\",\"description\":\"It is expected that the pressure impulse calculated by AUTODYN is less than that calculated analytically by a small percentage. The main reason that some analytical models over-predict the impulse is that they often do not account for the negative phase of pressure, where absolute pressure is less than the ambient pressure. If you plot\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-17T09:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-31T12:31:13+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ansys Knowledge\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN\u2019s. Why? | Ansys Knowledge","description":"It is expected that the pressure impulse calculated by AUTODYN is less than that calculated analytically by a small percentage. The main reason that some analytical models over-predict the impulse is that they often do not account for the negative phase of pressure, where absolute pressure is less than the ambient pressure. If you plot","canonical_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/#listItem","name":"Topics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Topics","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/#listItem","name":"structural-mechanics"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/#listItem","position":3,"name":"structural-mechanics","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/#listItem","name":"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN&#8217;s. Why?"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/#listItem","name":"Topics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/#listItem","position":4,"name":"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN&#8217;s. Why?","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/#listItem","name":"structural-mechanics"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#organization","name":"Ansys Knowledge","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/","name":"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN\u2019s. Why? | Ansys Knowledge","description":"It is expected that the pressure impulse calculated by AUTODYN is less than that calculated analytically by a small percentage. The main reason that some analytical models over-predict the impulse is that they often do not account for the negative phase of pressure, where absolute pressure is less than the ambient pressure. If you plot","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2023-03-17T09:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-31T12:31:13+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#website","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/","name":"Ansys Knowledge","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Ansys Knowledge | Ansys Innovation Space","og:type":"article","og:title":"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN\u2019s. Why? | Ansys Knowledge","og:description":"It is expected that the pressure impulse calculated by AUTODYN is less than that calculated analytically by a small percentage. The main reason that some analytical models over-predict the impulse is that they often do not account for the negative phase of pressure, where absolute pressure is less than the ambient pressure. If you plot","og:url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/","article:published_time":"2023-03-17T09:00:15+00:00","article:modified_time":"2023-07-31T12:31:13+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN\u2019s. Why? | Ansys Knowledge","twitter:description":"It is expected that the pressure impulse calculated by AUTODYN is less than that calculated analytically by a small percentage. The main reason that some analytical models over-predict the impulse is that they often do not account for the negative phase of pressure, where absolute pressure is less than the ambient pressure. If you plot"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"165420","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2025-10-17 22:10:46","updated":"2026-07-29 16:52:13","ai":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/\" title=\"Topics\">Topics<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/\" title=\"structural-mechanics\">structural-mechanics<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tI compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN\u2019s. Why?\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge"},{"label":"Topics","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/"},{"label":"structural-mechanics","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/"},{"label":"I compared the impulse time history calculated by AUTODYN with a conventional analytical model. I found that the analytical result is larger than AUTODYN&#8217;s. Why?","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/i-compared-the-impulse-time-history-calculated-by-autodyn-with-a-conventional-analytical-model-i-found-that-the-analytical-result-is-larger-than-autodyns-why\/"}],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_wp_page_template":["default"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["3\/15\/2023 20:20"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27789"],"_bbp_author_ip":["23.56.168.180"],"_btv_view_count":["495"],"siebel_km_number":["533389"],"product_version":["17"],"km_published_date":["2006-09-07T00:00:00.000Z"],"family":["Structural Mechanics"],"application_name":["AUTODYN"]},"test":"articlesansys-com"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/165420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/165420\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}