{"id":165260,"date":"2023-03-17T08:59:51","date_gmt":"2023-03-17T08:59:51","guid":{"rendered":"\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/"},"modified":"2023-07-31T12:30:55","modified_gmt":"2023-07-31T12:30:55","slug":"when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a","status":"publish","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/","title":{"rendered":"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; setting; however, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be documented anywhere.  Is &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn&#8217;t it documented?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>PSD uses Segalman-Reese for SIGE. This has nothing to do with &#8220;AVPRIN,2.&#8221;  &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; does exist, and it is undocumented. As the command echo notes, it is there for development testing. For simple cases where there is very little cross-mode correlation, then &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; and S-R will give similar results.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-165260","topic","type-topic","status-publish","hentry","topic-tag-4653","topic-tag-general","topic-tag-mapdl","topic-tag-mechanical-apdl-f-ansys","topic-tag-structural-mechanics"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"PSD uses Segalman-Reese for SIGE. This has nothing to do with &quot;AVPRIN,2.&quot; &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; does exist, and it is undocumented. As the command echo notes, it is there for development testing. For simple cases where there is very little cross-mode correlation, then &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; and S-R will give similar results.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ansys Knowledge | Ansys Innovation Space\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d setting; however, this doesn\u2019t seem to be documented anywhere. Is \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn\u2019t it documented? | Ansys Knowledge\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"PSD uses Segalman-Reese for SIGE. This has nothing to do with &quot;AVPRIN,2.&quot; &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; does exist, and it is undocumented. As the command echo notes, it is there for development testing. For simple cases where there is very little cross-mode correlation, then &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; and S-R will give similar results.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-17T08:59:51+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-31T12:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d setting; however, this doesn\u2019t seem to be documented anywhere. Is \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn\u2019t it documented? | Ansys Knowledge\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"PSD uses Segalman-Reese for SIGE. This has nothing to do with &quot;AVPRIN,2.&quot; &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; does exist, and it is undocumented. As the command echo notes, it is there for development testing. For simple cases where there is very little cross-mode correlation, then &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; and S-R will give similar results.\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Topics\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Topics\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"structural-mechanics\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"structural-mechanics\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; setting; however, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be documented anywhere.  Is &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn&#8217;t it documented?\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Topics\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; setting; however, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be documented anywhere.  Is &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn&#8217;t it documented?\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic-tag\\\/structural-mechanics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"structural-mechanics\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ansys Knowledge\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\\\/\",\"name\":\"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an \\u201cAVPRIN,2\\u201d setting; however, this doesn\\u2019t seem to be documented anywhere. Is \\u201cAVPRIN,2\\u201d using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn\\u2019t it documented? | Ansys Knowledge\",\"description\":\"PSD uses Segalman-Reese for SIGE. This has nothing to do with \\\"AVPRIN,2.\\\" \\\"AVPRIN,2\\\" does exist, and it is undocumented. As the command echo notes, it is there for development testing. For simple cases where there is very little cross-mode correlation, then \\\"AVPRIN,2\\\" and S-R will give similar results.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-17T08:59:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-31T12:30:55+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ansys Knowledge\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/knowledge\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d setting; however, this doesn\u2019t seem to be documented anywhere. Is \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn\u2019t it documented? | Ansys Knowledge","description":"PSD uses Segalman-Reese for SIGE. This has nothing to do with \"AVPRIN,2.\" \"AVPRIN,2\" does exist, and it is undocumented. As the command echo notes, it is there for development testing. For simple cases where there is very little cross-mode correlation, then \"AVPRIN,2\" and S-R will give similar results.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/#listItem","name":"Topics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Topics","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/#listItem","name":"structural-mechanics"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/#listItem","position":3,"name":"structural-mechanics","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/#listItem","name":"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; setting; however, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be documented anywhere.  Is &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn&#8217;t it documented?"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/#listItem","name":"Topics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/#listItem","position":4,"name":"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; setting; however, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be documented anywhere.  Is &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn&#8217;t it documented?","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/#listItem","name":"structural-mechanics"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#organization","name":"Ansys Knowledge","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/","name":"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d setting; however, this doesn\u2019t seem to be documented anywhere. Is \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn\u2019t it documented? | Ansys Knowledge","description":"PSD uses Segalman-Reese for SIGE. This has nothing to do with \"AVPRIN,2.\" \"AVPRIN,2\" does exist, and it is undocumented. As the command echo notes, it is there for development testing. For simple cases where there is very little cross-mode correlation, then \"AVPRIN,2\" and S-R will give similar results.","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2023-03-17T08:59:51+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-31T12:30:55+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#website","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/","name":"Ansys Knowledge","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Ansys Knowledge | Ansys Innovation Space","og:type":"article","og:title":"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d setting; however, this doesn\u2019t seem to be documented anywhere. Is \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn\u2019t it documented? | Ansys Knowledge","og:description":"PSD uses Segalman-Reese for SIGE. This has nothing to do with &quot;AVPRIN,2.&quot; &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; does exist, and it is undocumented. As the command echo notes, it is there for development testing. For simple cases where there is very little cross-mode correlation, then &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; and S-R will give similar results.","og:url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/","article:published_time":"2023-03-17T08:59:51+00:00","article:modified_time":"2023-07-31T12:30:55+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d setting; however, this doesn\u2019t seem to be documented anywhere. Is \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn\u2019t it documented? | Ansys Knowledge","twitter:description":"PSD uses Segalman-Reese for SIGE. This has nothing to do with &quot;AVPRIN,2.&quot; &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; does exist, and it is undocumented. As the command echo notes, it is there for development testing. For simple cases where there is very little cross-mode correlation, then &quot;AVPRIN,2&quot; and S-R will give similar results."},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"165260","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2025-10-17 22:02:18","updated":"2026-07-29 16:22:01","ai":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/\" title=\"Topics\">Topics<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/\" title=\"structural-mechanics\">structural-mechanics<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tWhen plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d setting; however, this doesn\u2019t seem to be documented anywhere.  Is \u201cAVPRIN,2\u201d using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn\u2019t it documented?\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge"},{"label":"Topics","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/topics\/"},{"label":"structural-mechanics","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic-tag\/structural-mechanics\/"},{"label":"When plotting von Mises stress in ANSYS Classic after a PSD analysis, the default (found through trial and error) seems to be using an &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; setting; however, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be documented anywhere.  Is &#8220;AVPRIN,2&#8221; using the Segalman-Reese method and why isn&#8217;t it documented?","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/forums\/topic\/when-plotting-von-mises-stress-in-ansys-classic-after-a-psd-analysis-the-default-found-through-trial-and-error-seems-to-be-using-an-avprin2-setting-however-this-doesnt-seem-to-be-documented-a\/"}],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_wp_page_template":["default"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["3\/15\/2023 20:20"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27789"],"_bbp_author_ip":["23.56.168.180"],"_btv_view_count":["991"],"siebel_km_number":["716200"],"product_version":["11"],"km_published_date":["2008-02-15T00:00:00.000Z"],"family":["Structural Mechanics"],"application_name":["Mechanical APDL (f. ANSYS)"]},"test":"articlesansys-com"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/165260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/165260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/knowledge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}