We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
Structural Dynamics

Structural Dynamics

Why is there a difference in the solution and convergence pattern for an interference fit model between solving in static vs transient cases when they both use the same mesh, contact settings and time step?

    • FAQFAQ
      Participant

      In interference fit, you are modeling the component installation step to create a pre-stress state, which is a static scenario, which is why it works well in a static analysis. In the case of a transient analysis, you add two additional terms to the governing equations to account for the inertial effects. As a result, while the solver is trying to resolve the interference step, a stress wave is travelling back and forth inside the material which makes it unstable and hence causes trouble with convergence. While solving a multi-step transient analysis where the first step is to generate the pre-stress condition by resolving the interference, the recommended way is to do this in transient analysis but turn off the time integration in step 1 so that the interference step is solved as a static case. You can find the option to turn off the time integration under Analysis Settings. Also, issue the following command to ramp all the loads in this step. KBC,0