{"id":51957,"date":"2021-02-05T21:05:03","date_gmt":"2021-02-05T21:05:03","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/topic\/solving-contact-region-and-unconvergence-based-on-initial-information\/"},"modified":"2021-02-05T21:05:03","modified_gmt":"2021-02-05T21:05:03","slug":"solving-contact-region-and-unconvergence-based-on-initial-information","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/solving-contact-region-and-unconvergence-based-on-initial-information\/","title":{"rendered":"Solving contact region and unconvergence based on initial information"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

In the following attached file for the static structural B the error message shows that the mpc contact region and boundary conditions have conflicts. I tried to understand the reason by reviewing initial information in the contact tool and solver output where it shows the presence of gap\/ penetration. I used the pinball region as auto detection value hoping that would sort the gap\/ penetration problem. And I used mpc formulation as suggested in another discussion to be ensured if bonded connections have established. But at the end it also doesn't solve it resulting the error and unconverged solution. Can someone kindly suggest me the possible solution and make correction in the attached file?<\/p>\n

https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1KG8QYWNISE0fKX_aGrZO9JMF-Z_xfZwh\/view?usp=drive_web<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\"Screenshot
\n<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-51957","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t