{"id":462860,"date":"2026-08-22T14:07:11","date_gmt":"2026-08-22T14:07:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/question-about-sale\/"},"modified":"2026-08-22T14:07:11","modified_gmt":"2026-08-22T14:07:11","slug":"question-about-sale","status":"publish","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/question-about-sale\/","title":{"rendered":"question about S\u2011ALE"},"content":{"rendered":"

Additional controlled test completed: a 2× S\u2011ALE mesh refinement changed the maximum total-energy loss only from 1.58755% to 1.59180%. Mass conservation, geometry, stable timestep, GLSTAT component closure and material-account closure all pass. The loss is primarily associated with the EMULSION material.<\/p>\n

Could anyone clarify two R16.1 output semantics questions?<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Is Ekinlos<\/code> an additive energy term that should be included in the global conservation balance?<\/li>\n
  2. Which supported database\/output gives per-cell, per-material internal energy, kinetic energy and burn fraction for axisymmetric S\u2011ALE with *MAT_HIGH_EXPLOSIVE_BURN<\/code>\/JWL?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    These definitions are needed before further numerical changes can be interpreted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-462860","topic","type-topic","status-publish","hentry","topic-tag-ale","topic-tag-energy-equation"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t