


{"id":457655,"date":"2026-05-06T08:55:03","date_gmt":"2026-05-06T08:55:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/different-capacitance-results-between-two-conductive-plates-with-different-autom\/"},"modified":"2026-05-06T08:55:03","modified_gmt":"2026-05-06T08:55:03","slug":"different-capacitance-results-between-two-conductive-plates-with-different-autom","status":"publish","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/different-capacitance-results-between-two-conductive-plates-with-different-autom\/","title":{"rendered":"Different capacitance results between two conductive plates with different autom"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;I am simulating the capacitance between&nbsp;<strong>two conductive plates<\/strong>. The plate-to-plate distance is swept from:&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;<strong>Hmin = 0.0011202 mm<\/strong>&lt;br&gt;to&lt;br&gt;<strong>Hmax = 4 mm<\/strong>&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The geometry, material setup, boundary conditions, and distance sweep are the same in all cases. However, I tested three different automatic mesh configurations and compared the capacitance result:&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;thead&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Case Study&lt;\/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;Mesh Refinement&lt;\/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;Dynamic Surface Resolution&lt;\/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;TAU Mesh&lt;\/th&gt;&lt;th align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;Hmin&lt;\/th&gt;&lt;th align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;Hmax&lt;\/th&gt;&lt;th align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;Maxwell Result (pF)&lt;\/th&gt;&lt;th align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;Q3D Result (pF)&lt;\/th&gt;&lt;\/tr&gt;&lt;\/thead&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Case 1&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Maximum&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Disabled&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Disabled&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;0.0011202 mm&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;4 mm&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;20.16&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;14.96&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;\/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Case 2&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Maximum&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Enabled&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Disabled&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;0.0011202 mm&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;4 mm&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;12.25&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;10.04&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;\/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Case 3&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Maximum&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Enabled&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Enabled&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;0.0011202 mm&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;4 mm&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;23.18&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;td align=&#8221;right&#8221;&gt;10.00&lt;\/td&gt;&lt;\/tr&gt;&lt;\/tbody&gt;&lt;\/table&gt;&lt;p&gt;<strong>Issue:<\/strong>&lt;br&gt;The calculated capacitance changes significantly depending on the automatic mesh settings, although the model setup is unchanged. For example, the Maxwell result changes from <strong>12.25 pF<\/strong> to <strong>23.18 pF<\/strong>, while the Q3D result changes from <strong>10.00 pF<\/strong> to <strong>14.96 pF<\/strong> over the same distance range.&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;<strong>Question:<\/strong>&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;section class=&#8221;text-token-text-primary w-full focus:outline-none [&#8211;shadow-height:45px] has-data-writing-block:pointer-events-none has-data-writing-block:-mt-(&#8211;shadow-height) has-data-writing-block:pt-(&#8211;shadow-height) [&amp;:has([data-writing-block])&gt;*]:pointer-events-auto [content-visibility:auto] supports-[content-visibility:auto]:[contain-intrinsic-size:auto_100lvh] R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(&#8211;scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(&#8211;thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(&#8211;header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]&#8221; dir=&#8221;auto&#8221; data-turn-id=&#8221;request-WEB:f025bfb5-c7c3-445c-a49e-59efae53e9e2-20&#8243; data-testid=&#8221;conversation-turn-12&#8243; data-scroll-anchor=&#8221;false&#8221; data-turn=&#8221;assistant&#8221;&gt;&lt;div class=&#8221;text-base my-auto mx-auto pb-10 [&#8211;thread-content-margin:var(&#8211;thread-content-margin-xs,calc(var(&#8211;spacing)*4))] @w-sm\/main:[&#8211;thread-content-margin:var(&#8211;thread-content-margin-sm,calc(var(&#8211;spacing)*6))] @w-lg\/main:[&#8211;thread-content-margin:var(&#8211;thread-content-margin-lg,calc(var(&#8211;spacing)*16))] px-(&#8211;thread-content-margin)&#8221;&gt;&lt;div class=&#8221;[&#8211;thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg\/main:[&#8211;thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(&#8211;thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group\/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn&#8221;&gt;&lt;div class=&#8221;flex max-w-full flex-col gap-4 grow&#8221;&gt;&lt;div class=&#8221;min-h-8 text-message relative flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 text-start break-words whitespace-normal outline-none keyboard-focused:focus-ring [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-1&#8243; dir=&#8221;auto&#8221; tabindex=&#8221;0&#8243; data-message-author-role=&#8221;assistant&#8221; data-message-id=&#8221;47c77b4d-5355-4f69-b091-b38500ece09d&#8221; data-message-model-slug=&#8221;gpt-5-5-thinking&#8221; data-turn-start-message=&#8221;true&#8221;&gt;&lt;div class=&#8221;flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden&#8221;&gt;&lt;div class=&#8221;markdown prose dark:prose-invert w-full wrap-break-word light markdown-new-styling&#8221;&gt;&lt;p data-start=&#8221;42&#8243; data-end=&#8221;424&#8243; data-is-last-node=&#8221;&#8221; data-is-only-node=&#8221;&#8221;&gt;Why do the capacitance results vary so much between these automatic mesh configurations? For capacitance extraction between two conductive plates, which software should I trust more, &lt;strong data-start=&#8221;241&#8243; data-end=&#8221;271&#8243;&gt;ANSYS Maxwell or ANSYS Q3D<\/strong>, and which mesh configuration should be considered the most reliable? Also, what is the recommended procedure to verify mesh convergence for this model?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/05\/06-05-2026-1778057437-mceclip1.png\" \/><a title=\"Source File &ndash; Capacitance Results Comparison Between Two Conductive Plates\" href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1UkA5H-PwPPw-MLbwMty-_IaUeAUvFFgo\/view?usp=drive_link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1UkA5H-PwPPw-MLbwMty-_IaUeAUvFFgo\/view?usp=drive_link<\/a>&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&lt;div class=&#8221;mt-3 w-full empty:hidden&#8221;&gt;&nbsp;&lt;\/div&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&lt;\/section&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-457655","topic","type-topic","status-publish","hentry","topic-tag-adaptivemesh-2","topic-tag-meshing"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_bbp_forum_id":["27793"],"_bbp_topic_id":["457655"],"_bbp_subscription":["561412","675360"],"_bbp_author_ip":["2001:638:208:1101:da10:3f07:433:bdc5"],"_bbp_last_reply_id":["457789"],"_bbp_last_active_id":["457789"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["2026-05-07 14:00:23"],"_bbp_reply_count":["1"],"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":["0"],"_bbp_voice_count":["2"],"_bbp_engagement":["561412","675360"],"_btv_view_count":["56"],"_bbp_topic_status":["unanswered"]},"test":"saeed-sedighrptu-de"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/457655","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/457655\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=457655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}